Google Michael Kuehl, Mary Letourneau, and read my articles, especially Mary Letourneau: A decade of Lies, Hatred, Nonsense, Hysteria, and Lunacy.

NH registrant, good point about the media, national and local, and its creation of a bogus “epidemic” of sex crimes, nationwide and even in New Hampshire. In 2013 and 2014, according to FBI statistics, real criminals, overwhelming recidivists with histories of violence and criminality that usually began at age 13 or 14, committed well over one million violent felonies (aggravated assaults, violent-forcible rapes, robberies, murders) and over 8 million nonviolent mala in se crimes (burglary, car theft, arson, vandalism, etc.) That’s over 3,000 violent crimes each day. Yet one rarely hears or reads about an “epidemic” of violent and other mala in se criminality. Virtually all such felonies are simply local news, fleetingly covered if at all and, apart from truly heinous crimes, soon forgotten.

Yet women teachers -some of them innocent and/or the victims of predators and criminals who sexually assault them- having sex with young men under age 18 is decried as an “epidemic” with virtually all such intrigues receiving national coverage, sometimes for months or even years, 20-years with Mary Letourneau.

If only we suffered from a similar “epidemic” of aggravated assaults, violent rapes, armed robberies, muggings, car-jackings, home invasions, and murders. If the number of criminals who commit violent and other mala in se crimes were comparable to the number of women teachers who transport biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise, the U.S. would be the safest country on earth and people could walk and ride the streets and live and sleep in their homes and so forth with almost no fear of violent crime.

I messed up on that last sentence. It should read:

Thanks to WMUR and several MA television news outlets reporting sex stories – no matter if they are not factual – on a daily basis, the average person, in our area, thinks sex crimes are at an epidemic level! I don’t see any changes happening up here in New England until this practice is reined in and eventually stopped.

Possession of child pornography is LIFE on the registry in New Hampshire. Is it warranted? No.

Is the Registry itself warranted? Absolutely NOT. The VERY LEAST they could do is make it a private registry with ONLY Law Enforcement having access to the information and only reporting changes if you MOVE OUT of the state! In New Hampshire, Registered Citizens are not only on the State Police website, but on Homefacts and City-Data. That’s 3 registries for the price of one! Homefacts and City-Data have nice google maps on the same page with directions to your house and a nice birds eye view of it, too.

We’re living targets. Several of us have been maimed and murdered in the area. Do the Police care? No. Does the public care? No. Thanks to WMUR and several MA television news outlets reporting sex crimes – no matter how trivial – on a daily basis. The average person thinks sex crimes are at an epidemic level!

Let’s go back to the infancy of the legislation that brings all to this forum. The very thing tha causes the injustices you listed are created behind the backs of the common citizen. Progressively the laws in larger states had to be adjusted due to the litany of lawsuit that have prevailed. For instance the extent of punishment handed out for a conviction involving a minor over 13 compared to one that’s12. Now a minor has more of a propensity on being fully developed on the cusp of 14 and lends to the likelihood of being sexually active. Subsequently we have a more evolving distinction of restrictions emplaced on someone on parole or probation, compared to someone off the books. The fight may be fruitless in other arenas, but the southern belt states seem to clench on to bible thumpology to a tee. The argument remains on the disparity given to registrants post conviction. It makes no absolute sense to disenfranchise offenders based on the nature of conviction. Say for instance you have a combat veteran released from prison who can’t utilize VA facilities for the purpose of deafeating homlessness and further can’t even stay in other subsidize dwellments, due to how congress has laws tied into funding on who can reside at such units. The outcry of the rape culture contained in prison barely blips the radar of your unconcerned and unmoved constituents in congress. You have inmates with a large disparity in regard to the length of probation, post release. And some states authorized the report of homosexuality between inmates to an estranged or displaced spouse. Hysteria is hurled in the face of the public with actors feeling vindicated and pacified to his or her heartfelt content. Repurposed victimization has no place in the justice system, spook politics should never sludge it’s slime on any bill or proposal ever to be put forward for consideration. Our nation of noble men have been lost for ages where notoriety and narcissistic have hijacked the intent of those who stood for good. I can think of no duty or scope of employment where a civil servant was ever proclaimed a self servant. So I go back to the men and woman who seemed to represent a brand and repertoire , whether than what this land was built on. Turn your head and close your eyes and then you have no character or compass. Cup your ears and shut your mouth then you are men who hear what you choose and speak up for nothing good.

Please explain how your comments, whatever they mean exactly, are relevant to “child sexual abuse” hysteria, CSA victimology, draconian prison sentences, sex-offender registration, and anything said in the article and 6 previous comments. Please be specific. I implore you to give us concrete examples of how anything you say relates to the lunacy and hysteria described by others.

One thing to be noted regarding any “re-offense” (and there have been high profile cases about this) is that many times when it comes to teacher/student relations, the re-offense takes place with THE EXACT SAME alleged “victim”. Which clearly shows that the helpless “victim” consented and wants to continue his/her relationship with the teacher/coach, etc, and the teacher/coach is NOT sleeping around with dozens of teenagers that everyone needs to be in fear for their child.
We not only blanket the laws in this country, we also blanket the “morals” of people according to how the lawmakers and people in general want us to live by.
No one can read another person’s true thoughts and emotions and no one..NO ONE, not even those who call themselves psychology specialists, can determine what any HUMAN BEING feels and thinks. So, that being said, just because it’s the “social norm” of the modern age to stay within one’s own age group when it comes to romance, the truth that everyone wants to deny is simply this: WE ARE A FORM OF ANIMAL WITH ANIMAL INSTINCTS SUCH AS SURVIVAL AND…brace yourself for this one….SEXUAL INTERACTIONS!!
The only thing we don’t have that other animals do is a “mating season”. But, BY NATURE (and you can argue with Mother Nature about this if you want) – we NATURALLY attract to YOUTH. There is NO ARGUMENT there. None at all. There is only DENIAL.
Do you think anyone back in the stone age could use excuses for post-pubescent teenagers that they’re still “kids” that need to BE kids by playing video games and riding their little bicycles? NO! Because there were no video games or bikes at the time.
As man progressed, it was COMMON PLACE for young women who were passed puberty to MARRY OLDER MEN. WTF happened to that???
If any of us were to ask our great-grandparents how much of an age gap there was between them when they met and “fell in love”, chances are we’d be calling great-grandad a “sex offender”.
We have become a society that likes to think and feel for other people. In other words, we want everyone to be a puppet/robot/Stepford that walks, talk, acts and does we do (morally of course). Because no GROWN MAN or WOMAN can possibly fall in love with a teenager who’s old enough to be given the privilege to operate a MOTOR VEHICLE! And how do we know this? We don’t. We assume and in our minds, our assumptions are correct.

Well, then ask the teacher who ended up MARRYING her alleged “victim” after her release from prison. I guess that PROVES that such relationships are IMPOSSIBLE, right? (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mary-kay-letourneau-fualaau-vili-fualaau-detail-path/story?id=30160737)
And it proves she’s a “predator” because she MARRIED her “victim” rather than go seeking out other young boys to have sex with. We should all be sooooooooooooooooo scared. *rolls eyes*

The sex offender hysteria MUST BE PUT TO REST. Period. Because for every person that gets put on the registry, there’s someone out there with NO criminal record that’s about to do something “wrong”. But let’s deny that and make the registered ones the scape-goats.