<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: When &#8220;ample alternatives&#8221; are neither	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/</link>
	<description>National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 16:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: d		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 20:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40372&quot;&gt;John W&lt;/a&gt;.

I like you. Thanks for sharing your knowledge John.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40372">John W</a>.</p>
<p>I like you. Thanks for sharing your knowledge John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 12:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40372&quot;&gt;John W&lt;/a&gt;.

John,
You&#039;re 100% correct. There have been several rulings on the &#039;knock &#038; talk concept.
Without a warrant, or reasonable cause to believe there is active criminal activity, an occupant of a private residence is not required to open the door or speak to them.
Absent a notification from the state that an offender has not registered, they have no probable cause to obtain a warrant or conduct an investigation. The fact that an rso chooses to exercise 4th amendment rights does not constitute cause for anything.
Of course, getting a warrant from a friendly local judge is probably a piece of cake.
I&#039;m like to come up with a method that would unite rso&#039;s across the country to exercise that right and throw a constitutional monkey wrench into these compliance checks.
They don&#039;t check on murderers, thieves, assault, (domestic or otherwise), or any other type of crime.
I think it provides food for thought that a registry is CLEARLY a Bill of Attainder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40372">John W</a>.</p>
<p>John,<br />
You&#8217;re 100% correct. There have been several rulings on the &#8216;knock &amp; talk concept.<br />
Without a warrant, or reasonable cause to believe there is active criminal activity, an occupant of a private residence is not required to open the door or speak to them.<br />
Absent a notification from the state that an offender has not registered, they have no probable cause to obtain a warrant or conduct an investigation. The fact that an rso chooses to exercise 4th amendment rights does not constitute cause for anything.<br />
Of course, getting a warrant from a friendly local judge is probably a piece of cake.<br />
I&#8217;m like to come up with a method that would unite rso&#8217;s across the country to exercise that right and throw a constitutional monkey wrench into these compliance checks.<br />
They don&#8217;t check on murderers, thieves, assault, (domestic or otherwise), or any other type of crime.<br />
I think it provides food for thought that a registry is CLEARLY a Bill of Attainder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40374&quot;&gt;Fred&lt;/a&gt;.

Fred,
Thanks for your kind reply. 
Is this the message forum, or am i missing something ?
I&#039;ve done thousands of hours of research and have a great deal to say.
Without going into details, (because i&#039;m not sure how &#039;secure&#039; this forum is), i&#039;ve already engaged the federal gov&#039;t in a legal battle under certain prohibitions in the adam walsh act and won.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40374">Fred</a>.</p>
<p>Fred,<br />
Thanks for your kind reply.<br />
Is this the message forum, or am i missing something ?<br />
I&#8217;ve done thousands of hours of research and have a great deal to say.<br />
Without going into details, (because i&#8217;m not sure how &#8216;secure&#8217; this forum is), i&#8217;ve already engaged the federal gov&#8217;t in a legal battle under certain prohibitions in the adam walsh act and won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40373&quot;&gt;Against the fine print of harrassment&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s laura ahern who&#039;s the queen of harassment. She&#039;s cozied up to politicians with her bogeyman mentality and secured grant money to operate a vigilante operation. She can&#039;t come up with a single statistic justifying her outlandish recidivism claims, and in fact, deliberately ignores existing statistics. She&#039;s a narcissist that&#039;s probably paying herself a ridiculous salary from the grant monies  to inflate her ego.
In any event, there is NO LAW requiring cooperation with these &#039;compliance&#039; checks and the tactics of bullying at the door, or requesting a police investigation if RSO&#039;s don&#039;t answer IS harassment, pure and simple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40373">Against the fine print of harrassment</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s laura ahern who&#8217;s the queen of harassment. She&#8217;s cozied up to politicians with her bogeyman mentality and secured grant money to operate a vigilante operation. She can&#8217;t come up with a single statistic justifying her outlandish recidivism claims, and in fact, deliberately ignores existing statistics. She&#8217;s a narcissist that&#8217;s probably paying herself a ridiculous salary from the grant monies  to inflate her ego.<br />
In any event, there is NO LAW requiring cooperation with these &#8216;compliance&#8217; checks and the tactics of bullying at the door, or requesting a police investigation if RSO&#8217;s don&#8217;t answer IS harassment, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 05:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40372&quot;&gt;John W&lt;/a&gt;.

In Michigan if you are a RSO and do not possess an ID when a police officer stops you, you can be arrested. We are required to keep a current id at all times.  If it is expired by one day you can be arrested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40372">John W</a>.</p>
<p>In Michigan if you are a RSO and do not possess an ID when a police officer stops you, you can be arrested. We are required to keep a current id at all times.  If it is expired by one day you can be arrested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 05:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40367&quot;&gt;tom&lt;/a&gt;.

I have not had anything this serious happen to me and this sounds bad.  You might consider talking to an attorney and filing a complaint against the department.    I have had situations were I was interrogated at my home and asked questions that were none of their business and seemed to be attempts to provoke me or get me to incriminate myself.  

Now to protect myself I always keep my doors locked so they HAVE to knock and can not just walk in behind me.  I also keep my smart phone close by.  If an unexpected visitor knocks I turn on the camera on my phone and keep it close to me, but not so obvious to them so that I can record any form of harassment.  So far there hasn&#039;t been any since I moved back to Michigan, but if there is I will have it recorded and will take it straight to my attorney and go from there.  

We have to take steps to protect ourselves from these rouge cops.    

I am glad to have you with us.  I hope to see you on the Message forum where we can discuss this topic in more length.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40367">tom</a>.</p>
<p>I have not had anything this serious happen to me and this sounds bad.  You might consider talking to an attorney and filing a complaint against the department.    I have had situations were I was interrogated at my home and asked questions that were none of their business and seemed to be attempts to provoke me or get me to incriminate myself.  </p>
<p>Now to protect myself I always keep my doors locked so they HAVE to knock and can not just walk in behind me.  I also keep my smart phone close by.  If an unexpected visitor knocks I turn on the camera on my phone and keep it close to me, but not so obvious to them so that I can record any form of harassment.  So far there hasn&#8217;t been any since I moved back to Michigan, but if there is I will have it recorded and will take it straight to my attorney and go from there.  </p>
<p>We have to take steps to protect ourselves from these rouge cops.    </p>
<p>I am glad to have you with us.  I hope to see you on the Message forum where we can discuss this topic in more length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Against the fine print of harrassment		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Against the fine print of harrassment]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40367&quot;&gt;tom&lt;/a&gt;.

tom-

There is a NY County using retired LEO&#039;s through subcontracted efforts to validate Reg&#039;d Citizen locations.  It has caused quite the stir.  Recommend you research this: How Do You Track Sex Offenders? NY County Hires Ex-Cops

If there is no formal ID presented and/or possibly a business card given to prove who they are and represent, you can refuse their bully tactics.  It technically violates the fine print of no harassment, which is what it sounds like these two people did.   The ID and/or business card gives you ability to validate their efforts with their office and your atty, if needed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40367">tom</a>.</p>
<p>tom-</p>
<p>There is a NY County using retired LEO&#8217;s through subcontracted efforts to validate Reg&#8217;d Citizen locations.  It has caused quite the stir.  Recommend you research this: How Do You Track Sex Offenders? NY County Hires Ex-Cops</p>
<p>If there is no formal ID presented and/or possibly a business card given to prove who they are and represent, you can refuse their bully tactics.  It technically violates the fine print of no harassment, which is what it sounds like these two people did.   The ID and/or business card gives you ability to validate their efforts with their office and your atty, if needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John W		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 06:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40367&quot;&gt;tom&lt;/a&gt;.

What I did since their last visit was I installed electronic locks, with battery back-up that automatically lock when I close the door and I can push a 4 digit code to re-enter. When the police come here on their so called verification sweeps, I step out on the porch while closing the door behind me. For $150 dollars at Best Buy, I installed a motion sensitive security camera that  records sight and sound onto an internal disk, and it also sends a copy of the video to my wife&#039;s computer, iphone, and ipad. by wi-fi., no matter where she is, even out of state or the country.  And the cam is pretty much in plain sight with a little red blinking light to show its activated. I haven&#039;t had a visit since I installed that, but I am willing to bet that there will be a different attitude.
      When they come to the door, they should already have your picture and registry report, so I don&#039;t know what the ID deal is all about. I think they&#039;re only to verify the info that you are required by law to give. They got your pic, their standing on your porch, that should be the verification right there. I&#039;m not a lawyer, but I don&#039;t believe there is any Federal, State, or County law that says you have to possess a drivers license or a passport to answer your door or watch TV in your living room. Isn&#039;t it ironic that we, who are regular people that made an unforgiving mistake one time in our life, have to go through the trouble and expense to protect ourselves from the police for the rest of our lives. And don&#039;t let us kid ourselves. I use to be a cop and I remember the mentality of: &quot;There is us, (the good guys) and there is them, (the enemy)&quot; It hasn&#039;t changed!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40367">tom</a>.</p>
<p>What I did since their last visit was I installed electronic locks, with battery back-up that automatically lock when I close the door and I can push a 4 digit code to re-enter. When the police come here on their so called verification sweeps, I step out on the porch while closing the door behind me. For $150 dollars at Best Buy, I installed a motion sensitive security camera that  records sight and sound onto an internal disk, and it also sends a copy of the video to my wife&#8217;s computer, iphone, and ipad. by wi-fi., no matter where she is, even out of state or the country.  And the cam is pretty much in plain sight with a little red blinking light to show its activated. I haven&#8217;t had a visit since I installed that, but I am willing to bet that there will be a different attitude.<br />
      When they come to the door, they should already have your picture and registry report, so I don&#8217;t know what the ID deal is all about. I think they&#8217;re only to verify the info that you are required by law to give. They got your pic, their standing on your porch, that should be the verification right there. I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but I don&#8217;t believe there is any Federal, State, or County law that says you have to possess a drivers license or a passport to answer your door or watch TV in your living room. Isn&#8217;t it ironic that we, who are regular people that made an unforgiving mistake one time in our life, have to go through the trouble and expense to protect ourselves from the police for the rest of our lives. And don&#8217;t let us kid ourselves. I use to be a cop and I remember the mentality of: &#8220;There is us, (the good guys) and there is them, (the enemy)&#8221; It hasn&#8217;t changed!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 02:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40362&quot;&gt;Travel_question&lt;/a&gt;.

They do not check permissions, etc, unless you are on a no fly list as a suspected terrorist, etc. In my home state of California, which did not adopt all of the requirements of the Adam Walsh Act, etc., there is no requrement to give advanced notificatikn of your travel plans, unless you are perhaps still on parole or probation. However, if and when the new International Megans Law takes effect, that will all change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40362">Travel_question</a>.</p>
<p>They do not check permissions, etc, unless you are on a no fly list as a suspected terrorist, etc. In my home state of California, which did not adopt all of the requirements of the Adam Walsh Act, etc., there is no requrement to give advanced notificatikn of your travel plans, unless you are perhaps still on parole or probation. However, if and when the new International Megans Law takes effect, that will all change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 02:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=3479#comment-40370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40350&quot;&gt;takingOneDay@aTime&lt;/a&gt;.

You are not stopped at the airport or put on a no fly list. I have travelled overseas many times. What they will do is report your travel to the destination country, especially if you are travelling to a country known as a destination for child sex tourism, such ss Mexico, Philippines, Thailand, etc. Then the destination country will.most likely deny  you entry and send you back. Homeland Security/ICE gets uour travel information from APIS, the passenger system every airline has to provide information to. The government checks the names of every passenger against a database of terrorists, sex offenders, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2016/05/when-ample-alternatives-are-neither/#comment-40350">takingOneDay@aTime</a>.</p>
<p>You are not stopped at the airport or put on a no fly list. I have travelled overseas many times. What they will do is report your travel to the destination country, especially if you are travelling to a country known as a destination for child sex tourism, such ss Mexico, Philippines, Thailand, etc. Then the destination country will.most likely deny  you entry and send you back. Homeland Security/ICE gets uour travel information from APIS, the passenger system every airline has to provide information to. The government checks the names of every passenger against a database of terrorists, sex offenders, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
