Fighting for human rights doesn’t require us to abandon sensibilities. There are a small number of words we simply will not publish. Your posting used one of them and was therefore replaced. Just like any other website, we reserve the right to edit comments. That’s the reason nobody’s comment is automatically published.

Who would have thought that on a site that fights for human rights that you would change the wording in my post. Thats not how I stated it. I would have rather you refused to post it, than edit it and change my wording. I will not post here again if thats what you people are about.

In 2010, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the “Halloween” statute cannot be applied to people who were convicted before the statute was written because it created “new duties”, a new punishment, therefore making it unconstitutional. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? The Supreme Court of Missouri declares that I was being punished a second time because of a law that would put me in prison if I, or any member of my household were to give a neighborhood kid a piece of candy between 5:00 PM and 10:30 PM on Oct. 31 of every year. Yet all of the other laws that have doomed me to failure are declared, regulatory, civil duties, and non-punitive.
It’s like being in a world where people know how to write words, but it doesn’t matter, because no one there can read.

You are correct about ordinances being written by a city or town. But I think somebody’s playing a joke on you if they told you that there is a such thing as a “not binding or a non-binding law.” Your town’s speed limit is an “ordinance” and if you violate it, you will be “bound” to a legal penalty.
It’s possible you’re thinking of an “unconstitutional law”. BUT, I think all laws, that are enacted by a constitutional legislative body, regardless of it being federal, state, city, or town, are automatically considered to be constitutional and will be enforced by the executive branch and be judged accordingly by the judicial branch. . A Supreme Court could overturn a law based on constitutional matter. BUT, that’s not likely to happen until a person is arrested, tried, and convicted, (and most likely sitting in prison), which would give him “cause” to challenge that ordinance, and then, sometime down the road, if he has lots of money or a constitutional rights organization deems it a worthwhile battle to fight, that person may or may not be absolved, based purely on the fact of who was the best debater, but keeping in mind that a prosecutor has bottomless pockets of money, and he will appeal the ruling if it was not in his favor. I would also add, from what I see of what’s happening in our country, that if the person is a registered ex-sex offender, his chance of a win doesn’t seem likely.

A lot of this is offensive and hurts those who don’t understand and seem to have their own “religism” over the other. In other words a lot of you people are being psyched out by a lot of these laws that are man made. So if we can all say Happy Halloween why can’t we all say Stand up for America.

I don’t think any of you people on here are wissy’s. Look at this election its either a grouper or a liar and some people are not even gonna vote any but its the duty for all American’s to vote for Justice.

Matthew, as far as the searches of homes and cars, that is applicable only to those on parole or probation, isn’t it? How about the curfew and prohibitions against smart phones, alcohol, and legal porn? All on the registry or just P and P?