Comments on: FBI commits crime to entrap American citizens; Operates half of child porn websites

By: VideoPortal

VideoPortal — Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:57:54 +0000

Yet, as advocates for those caught up in “entrapment” cases discover, there is little public or judicial sympathy for them. Even in cases where judges have admitted FBI tactics have raised serious questions, there has been no hesitation in returning guilty verdicts, handing down lengthy sentences and dismissing appeals.

By: Al Bookhart

Al Bookhart — Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:11:36 +0000

The F.B.I can’t look at child porn. That’s a crime. They can trash it. Then hope they don’t get another like it.

By: Lovecraft

Lovecraft — Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:30:20 +0000

I guess the FBI will have to register as a sex offender. They better hope none of their buildings are in violation of premise restrictions.

By: A new low for our country

A new low for our country — Sun, 13 Nov 2016 18:16:26 +0000

This whole thing reeks of a sewer level of thinking since it involved people, real people who could not make any choice here about their participation…..children. The FBI used children to their bidding. This is not like an adult, who has a choice, posing as a teen, a prostitute, a drug dealer or gun dealer, but this was using children in non-contact ways to entrap people. Condoning those who are on the dark web for this purpose and were entrapped should not happen, but the method of using those children, that the powers that be are sworn to defend and protect, without their consent, or their responsible adult’s consent, no less is criminal and reprehensible.

This is up there in reprehensibility of ISIS who uses children to snare enemy forces who are thinking the children are innocent. There is a history of children being used in such methods, but this is a new low for the FBI, Dept of Justice and this President.

This isn’t guns or drugs, but children who are being taught by adults what is right and wrong in life. Congress needs to look into this extremely quickly in the next few days/weeks to get it in the public’s eyes.

By: James Townsend

James Townsend — Sun, 13 Nov 2016 05:04:59 +0000

You know I liked that robot in “Lost in Space” Danger, Danger, Danger. While I I was caught up in a State level sting operation of sorts going FBI is a big step in setting up all this stuff. I think that’s something the new president needs to look into.

Preventing is what they should be more interested in but if theirs money involved some couldn’t care about justice even if someone is trying to pull one over on the other. Don’t we all have a responsibility to help others. If one gets burn once one doesn’t want to get burned twice.. We’re not talking small parking tickets. We’re talking about someone taking authority over another just because they used a potty mouth or were addicted to porn in some ways mean’s and fashion.

Now I believe in justice but there has to be a balance. Even after I get over my little ordeal of this polygraph test, which I pasted the one last time, I would think that just is doing a lot of others wrong. RSOL keep up the good work.

By: Judge has issues with this also

Judge has issues with this also — Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:47:11 +0000

In reply to Why the low level media coverage?.

Judge has ‘ethical and legal’ concerns over FBI running a massive ‘dark web’ child-porn site

http://www.seattletimes.com/news/judge-has-ethical-and-legal-concerns-over-fbis-massive-child-porn-sting/

By: Why the low level media coverage?

Why the low level media coverage? — Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:43:28 +0000

Where is the main stream media on this? Why are they not covering it? Shouldn’t FBI Director Comey, AG Lynch and President Obama be looking into this? Why isn’t the Justice Committee looking into this? Wouldn’t this be on the same scale of Fast and Furious gun sales when AG Holder was in office? How can this be elevated into the public’s consciousness?

By: david

david — Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:48:22 +0000

After being arrested in a “bait and switch” thru the Craigslist Personals I wonder how much internet crimes against children are “real’? Far as I can tell it’s extremely rare.

Isn’t viewing child porn considered by the law to be the same as committing an assault? So the FBI is assaulting children as part of their scheme to catch viewers of CP?

Wonder how those victims would feel if they knew the FBI was distributing images of them on the web?

By: Ron

Ron — Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:17:14 +0000

The tech industry is just as complicit as the government when it come to the production of such schemes and failures. State actors such as Isarel and et. al , all seek to exploit and profit from the very same venue utilizing extraction and mining tools to indentify alleged participants. The porn industry is let loose and unfettered in other countries and they have no interest or concern in profiting from the very same problem. People try to profoundly attach human trafficking to porn which is loosely based. The basic problem is countries don’t enforce policies when it comes to child porn, unless internationally or embarrassingly pressured to do so. porn is a unspoken staple to sexuality in many countries. Children should be no part of the inclusion. But to punish someone based on ensnaring entrapment and overboard authoritive techniques is not the role or scope of agency imposition on he general public. You have individual unsupervised discretion spewing from agents and other directorates within the department of justice. This needs to be tightly and severely regulated as to quell and nearly eliminate open abuse. As ideally suggested, an oversight prevention committee comprised of ordinary concerned citizens should be part of the warrant issuance process, cultivating “true transparency “. We have gone too far with bureaucratic bullying and the ignorant insistence that these progressive pursuits are supremely justifiable or naturally necessary. The government tends to groom its problematic policies around its citizens to stay relevant and advancing in the political scheme of things.