Comments on: Get real, Justice Alito! Stop misrepresenting the facts.

By: Joel

Joel — Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:50:14 +0000

Something to consider… These people are paid with tax dollars. If you have a bad employee you stop paying them. See the thread? For all of the political officials, both elected and appointed, stop paying them. Most of them refer to this country as a Democracy. This is a Republic. In a republic the people have the power. The government only has what power we give it. Take back your power. I knew a guy named Carl Miller. Lookup his lectures on the Constitution, on Youtube.

By: Tim L

Tim L — Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:31:18 +0000

I will say it again.
This was never about public safety from sexual deviancy.

THE DATABASE AND THE USES THEREOF!

SOs were a means to an end; POLITICAL SECURITY! (SEE The Little Prince, Machiavelli)

Our ( THE PEOPLE’S) forced focus upon their deviant is but a useful distraction – the proverbial RED HERRING!

Please start contemplating how the database is used by the powers that are. We have entrenched actors whom will do everything in their power to remain entrenched, because the money is so easy to come by.

Gov’t contracts are lucrative. Unions (public) benefited AND Big businesses benefit from the usefulness of the database. Consider the data use by NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon, DHS, and a thousand other federal avenges

Next consider the database and its role in gerrymandering and how it that relates to entrenchment of the two main political establishments. Consider too how quickly and easily laws can be enacted via the database to meet that goal. Sure beats the hell out of writing law by hand. Special interest of every sort are pounding keys as I type this short plea to keep themselves in the mix for a piece of the people’s tax pie!

It is my hope that Americans will soon become aware of the database, its uses, and the negative impact on constitutionally recognized liberty interests of individual life and happiness.

By: Rhonda

Rhonda — Sun, 25 Jun 2017 00:05:17 +0000

We need to get some university’s involved on proper study’s and statistic’s and then wave them until they can’t be disputed. then find a way to bring them into the court!Voice is the key the stronger the better!

By: T

Sat, 24 Jun 2017 00:50:44 +0000

I say keep up with the fight against those that distort information and hold them accountable for their malicious intent against registrants who are American citizens that have paid their debt to society. The only reason why they succeeded was because we did nothing to stop them, and we didn’t speak out against misinformation, and the people that try to get all kinds of malicious laws to passed. Edmund Burke said “the only thing necessary for triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing “.

By: Tim L

Tim L — Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:26:39 +0000

In reply to rwvnral. While tort immunity exists, it does NOT foreclose all redresses.( see Scalise V. Hodgkin'son).

By: rwvnral

rwvnral — Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:01:53 +0000

In reply to Rhonda. They cannot. Absolute sovereignty is absolute. And it shields most government actors from liability where mistakes of fact are concerned.

By: Rhonda

Rhonda — Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:27:13 +0000

Can’t Law suit’s be filed for misrepresentation of of statistics when these Judges and government agency’s know the data they use is inaccurate is’nt there a study on actual rearrest that are made on new sex crimes not talking an offender who was arrested for a violation or shop lifting only a crime that would be considered a new sex crime regardless of who committed the crime those are the figures that should be used not some fictional figure by a Dr. from 1980’s

By: Use it in a sentence please?

Use it in a sentence please? — Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:49:05 +0000

In reply to rwvnral. I want to give Robin two thumbs up for using "Canard" in a sentence like he did and in a way most folks may not (or may) know. Let's see Scripps use it like he did in competition!

By: rwvnral

rwvnral — Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:20:53 +0000

In reply to david. That's precisely the point. The back and forth about Alito's statistic misses the WAPO's argument. Alito has inserted statistically useless (but accurate) information MADE TO LOOK as though it's important because it forms the basis of Alito's arguments IN SUPPORT of the Packingham outcome. Otherwise, there is little value or support coming from the statistic. So, except for the sake of the tired canard about recidivism, what's it doing in there? Alito might as well be talking about brand loyalty or something.

By: david

david — Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:51:55 +0000

Well duh…you can’t be RE-arrested for a sex crime unless you already were arrested for a sex crime. So yeah, SO’s are more likely than non- SO’s to be RE- arrested.

Is there something i’m missing in this logic?