<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Solicitor General to SCOTUS: Don&#8217;t grant Snyder petition	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/</link>
	<description>National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 15:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 21:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was reading the solicitor general&#039;s recommendation not to grant certiorari.  

Kennedy&#039;s remarks were mentioned about the high recidivism, but I must have missed the rebutting to that myth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading the solicitor general&#8217;s recommendation not to grant certiorari.  </p>
<p>Kennedy&#8217;s remarks were mentioned about the high recidivism, but I must have missed the rebutting to that myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interesting SO legal wrangling perspectives		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interesting SO legal wrangling perspectives]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good read here on what SCOTUS is doing and not doing

Sex offender consequences in the Supreme Court – what’s ahead?

http://ccresourcecenter.org/2017/07/18/the-supreme-courts-mixed-signals-in-packingham/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read here on what SCOTUS is doing and not doing</p>
<p>Sex offender consequences in the Supreme Court – what’s ahead?</p>
<p><a href="http://ccresourcecenter.org/2017/07/18/the-supreme-courts-mixed-signals-in-packingham/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://ccresourcecenter.org/2017/07/18/the-supreme-courts-mixed-signals-in-packingham/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremy Heady		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Heady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2023/12/wisconsins-lifetime-gps-monitoring-challenged/#comment-42471&quot;&gt;Dotlymymn&lt;/a&gt;.

This is where ex past facto decisions come into play.  If a jurisdiction has declared their registry as punitive, then nobody currently on it can be held to a new stricter law.  Also, if they change the law to be more lax, they cannot revert back and have it apply to any registrant that was on the lax laws.  This is probably one of the deciding factors in Ohio right now.  If they pass the lax laws and being in the 6th circuit,  they can never go back.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2023/12/wisconsins-lifetime-gps-monitoring-challenged/#comment-42471">Dotlymymn</a>.</p>
<p>This is where ex past facto decisions come into play.  If a jurisdiction has declared their registry as punitive, then nobody currently on it can be held to a new stricter law.  Also, if they change the law to be more lax, they cannot revert back and have it apply to any registrant that was on the lax laws.  This is probably one of the deciding factors in Ohio right now.  If they pass the lax laws and being in the 6th circuit,  they can never go back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rwvnral		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rwvnral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22200&quot;&gt;DW&lt;/a&gt;.

The Supreme Court is not likely to consider it at all. The Court will consider only the questions presented related to the specific case and controversy we all call &lt;em&gt;Snyder&lt;/em&gt;.  The Court will be bound by its own stare decisis in assessing how to rule on the &lt;em&gt;Snyder&lt;/em&gt; case IF (And I regard that as a huge IF right now) the petition for cert is granted.  As persuasive authority goes, the high Court is least likely to be impressed by the outcome of a state supreme court decision.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22200">DW</a>.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court is not likely to consider it at all. The Court will consider only the questions presented related to the specific case and controversy we all call <em>Snyder</em>.  The Court will be bound by its own stare decisis in assessing how to rule on the <em>Snyder</em> case IF (And I regard that as a huge IF right now) the petition for cert is granted.  As persuasive authority goes, the high Court is least likely to be impressed by the outcome of a state supreme court decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DW		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have an opinion as to how SCOTUS may consider the PA Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that relieved three defendants of SORNA compliance who were required to register under Megan&#039;s Law? The court said defendants were entitled to only those laws applicable to their cases when their pleas were accepted by the court. Doesn&#039;t this bolster the &quot;congress shall pass no law abridging contracts&quot; along with Michigan&#039;s ex-post-facto ruling?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have an opinion as to how SCOTUS may consider the PA Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling that relieved three defendants of SORNA compliance who were required to register under Megan&#8217;s Law? The court said defendants were entitled to only those laws applicable to their cases when their pleas were accepted by the court. Doesn&#8217;t this bolster the &#8220;congress shall pass no law abridging contracts&#8221; along with Michigan&#8217;s ex-post-facto ruling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rwvnral		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rwvnral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22198&quot;&gt;Bill&lt;/a&gt;.

The Chief Justice generally sets the Court&#039;s flow of traffic.  So, it&#039;s entirely up to him.  The Supreme Court is not bound by any time constraints.  It can move as fast or as slow as it prefers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22198">Bill</a>.</p>
<p>The Chief Justice generally sets the Court&#8217;s flow of traffic.  So, it&#8217;s entirely up to him.  The Supreme Court is not bound by any time constraints.  It can move as fast or as slow as it prefers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DOJ urges SCOTUS not to review Sixth Circuit panel decision finding retroactive application of Michigan sex offender law unconstitutional.

Now that the Solictor General has urged SCOTUS not to review; is there a timeline for the court to make a decision to review or not to review?  The original date was back in March; which is now past.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOJ urges SCOTUS not to review Sixth Circuit panel decision finding retroactive application of Michigan sex offender law unconstitutional.</p>
<p>Now that the Solictor General has urged SCOTUS not to review; is there a timeline for the court to make a decision to review or not to review?  The original date was back in March; which is now past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erika		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2017 07:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2023/12/wisconsins-lifetime-gps-monitoring-challenged/#comment-42490&quot;&gt;RichardMomma&lt;/a&gt;.

As I recall the same Doe (Doe -v- Alaska) who initiated the federal court route challenged it again on possibly different grounds again on the state court route to the Supreme Court of Alaska.

IN A NUTSHELL:
I believe the decision ONLY applies to pre-1996 defendants in state or those who move to Alaska as ex-post facto and unconstitutional parting ways with the stare decisis of the United States Supreme Courts analysis in Doe -v- Alaska.

Important caveat: I recall this from memory so please double check!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2023/12/wisconsins-lifetime-gps-monitoring-challenged/#comment-42490">RichardMomma</a>.</p>
<p>As I recall the same Doe (Doe -v- Alaska) who initiated the federal court route challenged it again on possibly different grounds again on the state court route to the Supreme Court of Alaska.</p>
<p>IN A NUTSHELL:<br />
I believe the decision ONLY applies to pre-1996 defendants in state or those who move to Alaska as ex-post facto and unconstitutional parting ways with the stare decisis of the United States Supreme Courts analysis in Doe -v- Alaska.</p>
<p>Important caveat: I recall this from memory so please double check!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JS		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2017 00:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Florida tries to out-do every other state in terms of how miserable law enforcement tries to make the lives of registered men and women a living hell!  IF the SCOTUS decides to hear the case, I wonder if there will be an amicus curai who can somehow incorporate what has come out since SCOTUS ruled on Alaska&#039;s Doe v Smith, in that the so-called &#039;statistic&#039; the Feds used to convince SCOTUS that registered people are &#039;danagerous and a high risk of reoffending&#039; was literanlly taken out of context, even according to the very man who wrote that statistic years earlier and admitted it did not mean what the Feds twisted minds said it did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida tries to out-do every other state in terms of how miserable law enforcement tries to make the lives of registered men and women a living hell!  IF the SCOTUS decides to hear the case, I wonder if there will be an amicus curai who can somehow incorporate what has come out since SCOTUS ruled on Alaska&#8217;s Doe v Smith, in that the so-called &#8216;statistic&#8217; the Feds used to convince SCOTUS that registered people are &#8216;danagerous and a high risk of reoffending&#8217; was literanlly taken out of context, even according to the very man who wrote that statistic years earlier and admitted it did not mean what the Feds twisted minds said it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22195</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalrsol.org/?p=5723#comment-22195</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22194&quot;&gt;Jim&lt;/a&gt;.

I thought that is what you might had been getting at.  I agree.  The U.S. is a nation of hypocrites, blinded by American exceptionalism.  We are getting better, but we still have  a ways to go.  It is a struggle to remain patient though, it&#039;s 2017...CMON!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2017/07/solicitor-general-to-scotus-dont-grant-snyder-petition/#comment-22194">Jim</a>.</p>
<p>I thought that is what you might had been getting at.  I agree.  The U.S. is a nation of hypocrites, blinded by American exceptionalism.  We are getting better, but we still have  a ways to go.  It is a struggle to remain patient though, it&#8217;s 2017&#8230;CMON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
