<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Laws driven by misinformation or by facts &#8212; which should we strive for?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.narsol.org/2021/06/laws-driven-by-misinformation-or-by-facts-which-should-we-strive-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.narsol.org/2021/06/laws-driven-by-misinformation-or-by-facts-which-should-we-strive-for/</link>
	<description>National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 16:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2021/06/laws-driven-by-misinformation-or-by-facts-which-should-we-strive-for/#comment-35609</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=84073#comment-35609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What doesn&#039;t make sense, even in this nonsensical world, is why a court which would not accept polygraphs as evidence is perfectly OK with them being used as &quot;therapy?&quot; If you haven&#039;t read the e-book, &quot;The Lie Behind the Lie Detector,&quot; I recommend it.  I&#039;ve read it and taken two polygraphs. It was accurate down to the last bit. The polygraph is nothing more than a very poor parlor trick. There&#039;s no science to it, and quite a bit against it. This does prove one thing, licensed psychologists or psychiatrists are supposed to use science-based treatments only. The polygraph proves that they are not using science at all, but jumping on the money wagon that is the SO world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What doesn&#8217;t make sense, even in this nonsensical world, is why a court which would not accept polygraphs as evidence is perfectly OK with them being used as &#8220;therapy?&#8221; If you haven&#8217;t read the e-book, &#8220;The Lie Behind the Lie Detector,&#8221; I recommend it.  I&#8217;ve read it and taken two polygraphs. It was accurate down to the last bit. The polygraph is nothing more than a very poor parlor trick. There&#8217;s no science to it, and quite a bit against it. This does prove one thing, licensed psychologists or psychiatrists are supposed to use science-based treatments only. The polygraph proves that they are not using science at all, but jumping on the money wagon that is the SO world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
