John Paul Reed,

Someone who was a danger is not necessarily a danger today this is side stepping due process. This law also shifts the burden of proof onto the defendant this is never allowed in any other situation. If you do not believe in due process or the burden of proof being on the accuser then you should not be any where near a position of authority in this country. There are people on the registry that are innocent, and also people who did nothing to a child at all. To allow a umbrella of destruction on this magnitude to punish people is unacceptable.

Best Regards

A Mistake They Made

What address to the UN are you referencing? We are not aware of any address to the UN explicitly addressing sexual offense registration laws in the states of the United States. Can you help us out with that? If there are things that we, at NARSOL, are not aware of, we rely upon people (such as yourself) to make us aware. Again, we are not magicians here. We have no special powers of perception or knowledge. We are creating a space for people to come together and share their collective knowledge. So, when you say that “it’s almost as though this site is an obscure objection to the registry” you are merely supporting Phil’s terribly offensive assault that NARSOL is a scam. This is incorrigible to me. It’s a baseless and fact-less assault on our organizational character. I take it as personally offensive, as well. It’s the sort of “talk” that just makes those of us who are so heavily invested in this cause to give up and say “Whatever! These people don’t seem to care one way or the other who is trying to fight for them. All they do is complain about their own personal dilemmas with the registry. They don’t give a damn about anyone else but themselves.”

I certainly can understand your thoughts on this matter. I have serious doubts sometimes about NARSOL’s true interest in the registry. Not because I don’t think they are doing anything, but rather that they go about it in a manner which points out all the harm but is incapable of any real impact towards the future dismantling of the registry. There are loads of articles on here pointing out the blatant wrong and harm of these laws, however I don’t know what impact NARSOL has had in curbing any of these policies. It’s almost as though this site is an obscure objection to the registry, yet without meaningful results. I may be wrong, but the registry is beyond the US at this point and several nations are adopting similar laws in their countries. I don’t hear much about this on NARSOL. Neither do I hear about the address to the UN about these laws in the United States. I’ve mentioned this before from the justfactsnotfear.com website and every mention of it is deleted. I don’t understand this to save my life as it directly deals with the registry yet Noone here wants it to even be made known. That seems extremely counter productive to say the least in bringing the real fight against the registry to more people. It’s a very odd, peculiar and strange fact that this site refuses to cover this. I for one believe NARSOL has potential though, so stick it out I will.

Be this as it may, I’ll still support NARSOL by my purchases online and hope others will do the same.

Phil,
NARSOL is competing with the powers of United States of America & BIG TECH. David versus Goliath is an understatement in exponential proportions. Referring to the effort being made as a SCAM is hurtful. But then you’re used to choosing that path. I wonder if you’d even bother to post at all if you actually thought that.

By my own experience this advocacy would benefit from utilizing another tact, namely confronting the issues in the context of an state FTR – failure to provide information case, rather than filing suits at the federal level, would prove more useful albeit more dangerous for the registrant in terms of incarceration.

Was there bipartizan support for this law? If so, neither party can be counted as an ally.

Once someone commits a sexually based offense, particularly against a child or teenager, they are presumed by society as irredeemable. Our laws reflect public sentiment. As far as most of society is concerned, those of us with crimes against children don’t have a right to even be breathing.

Florida has long been a haven for medieval thinking when it comes to not only sex offenses , but what they consider crimes in general. Which is hypocritical, considering so many public officials there have been caught breaking the very same laws enacted.

If only they just would’ve stuck to the Constitution instead of infecting us with progressive agendas. At least the Constitution served as a protection for the average person…now we’ve become overrun with “laws” to the point where we need “lawyers”.

Either that or wear a mask at this point…hm.

What on earth are you talking about? Have you read the Vision and Mission statements on the website? I have not spent the last decade of my life devoted to the work of a “scam”…nor have all the many members, volunteers, and financial supporters who have selflessly given of their time and resources. So where do you get off calling NARSOL a scam? Are you a member? Have you contributed anything to help?

NARSOL opposes registries. That’s why we exist. But we’re not magicians. This is a long fight and we need people who are committed to it for the long term. What we do NOT need are people who cast aspersions against us on the basis of facts they do not even have in the first place.

I continue to state that NARSOL is not against the registry scheme at all. There is no point in continuing to produce article, after article if we are not pursuing abolishing such a scheme from ever being imposed ever again.

NARSOL is a scam in my opinion.