Comments on: Still no decision in Wisconsin GPS lawsuit

By: Nick

Nick — Sun, 22 Jan 2023 04:15:41 +0000

What is ‘extreme intrusiveness’?
Is it anything like the psychotropic torture innocent non-felon, US born, voting, home owning, US citizens have been experiencing in the state of Wisconsin? In particular in the 4th ward of Janesville Wisconsin?

By: Christopher Brown

Christopher Brown — Tue, 02 Aug 2022 20:55:32 +0000

Lol,scotus in grady vs NC,ruled this is a 4th amd.search,and must be viewed properly as a search!!!!
So make the court view this as a search n u cannot lose!!!
Why? The state has no exception to the warrant requirement,they played dirty by bypassing the warrant requirement when using a gps tracker,it makes no difference how dangerous they say u are.make them go buy the law n u got them,warrantless search for life! Reasonable under the 4th amendment,no way! If so then u just trashed the 4th amendment.cant use special needs doctrine,because it a law enforcement based search don’t have diminished privacy just because ur in a civil,non punitive sex offender.program.u have paid ur debt to society.the state has no hold on u like a probation or parole program,again goddamit ur in a non punitive program,otherwise its a xo PO facto violation,sorry state u cant have it both ways.

By: Marlin Scott

Marlin Scott — Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:20:06 +0000

It would be good if several in North Carolina banned together an filed a simular class action case. I have long wanted to get in on the action because of the life-time sentence of GPS. How can the Reasonableness clause be applied for one class of offenders but not for others being subjected to life-time SBM? And how would a person without the financial capability become involved in lobbying for changes in these laws?

By: William Gerald Bennett

William Gerald Bennett — Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:17:26 +0000

The craziest part of this entire GPS equation is that regardless how much time any defendant may serve on GPS monitoring there is still no sentence credit provision toward the completion of anyone’s sentence… The department currently determines hours in your residence as well as hours out as well as where each individual is allowed to go… so if any individual is “locked down” in their residence for any amount of hours everyday, they still receive zero sentence credit toward service of their sentence… while an individual who is placed on ankle monitoring for Huber receives sentence credit for everyday served… can anyone say “equal protection” because to say non registrants get credit while registrants do not is severely demonstrative of legal bias to an otherwise similarly situated class in terms of anyone required to wear monitoring equipment…

By: William Gerald Bennett

William Gerald Bennett — Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:04:16 +0000

In Packingham v. North Carolina (2016) The United States Supreme Court struck down any law or supervision rules that interfere with a registrants ability to utilize social media as long as the defendant did not use the internet to facilitate their offense… but wouldn’t you know Wisconsin doesn’t care what the highest court in the land says as my agent still directed me to shut down all of my social media accounts…

By: William Gerald Bennett

William Gerald Bennett — Thu, 17 Jun 2021 23:50:40 +0000

I have been on the registry for 20 years following a plea agreement NOT to have to register… no sooner did I sign the written negotiated plea agreement and they registered me the same day anyways… I have spoke to every attorney I have ever had about this and they all claim it is outside the scope of their representation…they don’t care what is legal in Wisconsin… or even if a higher court rules in our favor… they do whatever they want…