Comments on: What would we ask the President?

By: Perry P.

Perry P. — Tue, 05 Oct 2021 07:11:34 +0000

I would hope that someday, a President WILL, make that Bold a move. Yet, it would most likely cost him or her a potential second Term in Office.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:07:38 +0000

Require states, like Alaska, to follow the Due Process Notice in the Offense, instead of giving the notice it is a “class C felony” and then allowing them to punish it as an Unclassified, just because its a sex offense.
Also why does the Government not step in and prevent states from knowingly using Mandatory Presumptive Sentencing Guidelines, like AK does, which has been outlaws by US V Booker, for over 15 years???
Why does the federal government turn a Blind Eye when the states knowingly and willfully violate the Law of the Land, and make a mockery of the Constitution, which sadly includes all those whom have fought and died to protect the Consitution????

By: mut

mut — Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:19:33 +0000

obamacare litigation makes it clear to me that “regulation” of commerce does not include forcing people to perform the act of buying insurance.

By: mut

mut — Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:03:54 +0000

Nevada imposed a “duty” on (1) the criminal history repository, (2) the department of prisons, (3) local law enforcement and (4) certain convicted persons. the word “duty” appears some 43 times in AB579. everyone here is well compensated for their services except the convicted person which is subornation — punishment per se — the substance of which should be evaluated in pari materia:
being forced from ones home or immediate vicinity (to appear at a registration facility) is a 4th amendment seizure under e.g. Terry and Peyton (as indistingushable from an arrest) that usually results in damages if without a warrant, probable cause or exigent circunstance. the only other government power to intrude on the life of a citizen i am aware of is its subpoena power where a citizen need not respond unless his fees and costs of appearance are advanced to him, which is the civil way of conducting business in america. so here again, is subornation, ultimately for the luxury of others.
so when a judge says registration is not punishment (civil or criminal) or even burdensome he simply is not in touch with reality.

imo.

By: mut

mut — Sun, 25 Jul 2021 14:22:04 +0000

In reply to Brandon. i think congress was ineptly concerned only with retroactivity and denominated the AWA a civil regulation in order to get around the expost facto clause and did so without ever considering the 13th amendment ban on civil servitude.

By: Brandon

Brandon — Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:49:46 +0000

One of my questions would be if something is civil how come the penalties are severe. Trying to figure out the laws in all 50 states and even in state is like walking through a mind field blindfolded. Resources should be used to actually help people succeed regardless of what’s in their past.

By: mut

mut — Sat, 24 Jul 2021 13:14:58 +0000

mr president:
would you retaliate against me if i sued you under 18 usc 1595?

By: The truth

The truth — Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:22:55 +0000

Why advocate for only tier 1 & 2 to fall off? As you know, one can be classified as tier 3 based of the alleged victims age alone, not that they did anything any worse than anyone else, not to mention some states even give tier 3 for cp. I myself am listed as tier 3 yet have been put now for nearly 14 years, am married, have young children of my own, and raised step children, yet somehow I’m dangerous, deserving of lifetime registration?

By: Edward Easton

Edward Easton — Sun, 11 Jul 2021 19:34:30 +0000

Should be a NARSOL priority project to get this in front of every state legislature in the nation as well as the Federal Congress.

By: d

Wed, 07 Jul 2021 16:52:50 +0000

I would just tell him what its like to be on the registry, and remind him this could be your son someday.