@Sasha,
It is very important to make a clear distillation between STATE POWER vs FEDERAL POWER, the latter being the greater entity with the ability to superimpose upon the whole so long as there is a vote by each congress of the states to make it so. Do not confuse the two sovereigns, nor their similar but different structures as applied to the individual citizen. While we discuss law we completely rely upon administrative interpretation of INTENT based on words as interpreted by courts. In effect SCOTUS as it exists today is the gatekeeper to defining the gov limit. By not jumping in ( granting cert.) SCOTUS ultimately agrees ( albeit quietly) with what was determined by the last court ( simply applied sound process and precedents) was correct. In this case here about state IDs, which is completely a State’s concern, the Supreme Court of the US has rejected getting in the fight primarily because it completely up to individual states to determine the information put on state IDs. Passports are Federal IDs and so some offenders have two forms of personal IDs with the marks denoting criminal behavior.

the problem is with the database use

I hope so. I still do not understand why such a horrible way to identify someone and the State is fine with it. Instead of the State conceding, it must continue to force someone to wear a burden.
I am also taken back by the penalties imposed on defacing such ID.
I wonder if they would impose such ID on the vaccinated or unvaced. How about other post incarcerated or other for failing to pay back taxes, etc..
One can only hope this means a change, however, the State will continue to push things to the limit.