<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Connecticut Supreme Court delivers hopeful verdict	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.narsol.org/2021/12/connecticut-supreme-court-delivers-hopeful-verdict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.narsol.org/2021/12/connecticut-supreme-court-delivers-hopeful-verdict/</link>
	<description>National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2023 00:34:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim in WI		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2021/12/connecticut-supreme-court-delivers-hopeful-verdict/#comment-24112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim in WI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=86263#comment-24112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This case is hopeful in particular with it&#039;s emphasis on due process, &quot;prior to being classified as a sex offender.&quot; However we know this citizen was not convicted of an offense(s) with the duty to registration attached to them.
Yet state&#039;s DPS attached it to him anyway. In other words &quot;the people&quot; acted completely without the evidence necessary to proceed in action! The word for such can be found in law. The word is caprice. And when the internal review was demanded by the defendant the reviewer sided with their bosses and claimed legitimacy. The word for this is party to caprice. This is real evidence of the &quot; something else afoot &quot; mentioned in the 9th circuit in the tortured history of Alaska v. (Doe). It is the very same reason why I&#039;ve demanded FTR trial by jury instead of submitting to registration demands. There IMO can never be in the true interest of the people to ignore basic constitutional limitations the people set upon Congress. But that is where the Madison Avenue comes into play via MSM. Those folks can sell the people anything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case is hopeful in particular with it&#8217;s emphasis on due process, &#8220;prior to being classified as a sex offender.&#8221; However we know this citizen was not convicted of an offense(s) with the duty to registration attached to them.<br />
Yet state&#8217;s DPS attached it to him anyway. In other words &#8220;the people&#8221; acted completely without the evidence necessary to proceed in action! The word for such can be found in law. The word is caprice. And when the internal review was demanded by the defendant the reviewer sided with their bosses and claimed legitimacy. The word for this is party to caprice. This is real evidence of the &#8221; something else afoot &#8221; mentioned in the 9th circuit in the tortured history of Alaska v. (Doe). It is the very same reason why I&#8217;ve demanded FTR trial by jury instead of submitting to registration demands. There IMO can never be in the true interest of the people to ignore basic constitutional limitations the people set upon Congress. But that is where the Madison Avenue comes into play via MSM. Those folks can sell the people anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
