Comments on: What will the new federal SORNA regulations mean?

By: Will

Will — Tue, 25 Apr 2023 05:07:25 +0000

Adam Walsh supposedly fights against the Exploitation of children But he Hypocritically uses the name of his son In laws involving sexual acts. Yes his son was abducted and murdered But was not sexually abused or assaulted That is disgraceful For a man to Exploit his son’s Tragedy To promote laws That Have no connection to the name of his son.

By: Lane

Lane — Sat, 29 Oct 2022 22:40:45 +0000

I was denied access to a Royal Caribbean cruise three weeks before the cruise was scheduled to leave Rome’s port (Aug 2022). I had been paying for the cruise over a matter of eight months but apparently they don’t look into passengers until final payment has been made. I have been cruising for over a decade with no issue so I can only assume SORNA is somehow to blame.
We worked with the travel agent and switched to a land based trip so that we wouldn’t lose money for the flight. I entered Italy with no issue. We traveled Italy with no issue. I was subjected to extreme scrutiny in Chicago. My luggage was searched and they took my phone and searched it. Interestingly, my crime was from 2003 and had nothing to do with the internet or inappropriate pictures.

By: VOUTRES VOUS USA!

VOUTRES VOUS USA! — Sun, 05 Jun 2022 00:25:40 +0000

New York State Will Never Comply! They Allow You to Notify ONE DAY Before You Leave the Country!

By: Good Citizen

Good Citizen — Thu, 05 May 2022 03:25:38 +0000

In reply to Jerald Hood.

I can see how you would view it as a form of slavery, and Ive looked this up years ago. The closest I could find was Involuntary Servitude which may be like Indentured Servitude see Article 2 clause 2 in the Constitution. Every since the first case in Alaska it was said it was Civil in nature, not that it is Civil, big difference in wording. But even if it was Civil, why are all the laws under Criminal Statues, and not Civil, and all penalties are Criminal, and not Civil.
I think Its an unconstitutional Law or laws since they seem to be stacking them, to make it harder to challenge. When laws are stacked its intended to stick around for 100s of years. Its not easy getting to a higher court it takes money, time, and a lawyer who is willing to go against the grain, and put their career on the table for a principle. Not every lawyer is up for this. I always say ask more than one lawyer what they think on a law, and you’ll get different responses lol… Just because one said it one way does not mean they’re right, and the rest are wrong.

By: Jerald Hood

Jerald Hood — Sun, 13 Mar 2022 01:14:49 +0000

This is nothing more than pure slavery and slavery was abolished in 1865 we are all slaves of the government.

By: Tina

Tina — Wed, 02 Feb 2022 20:06:28 +0000

You cannot take 1 set of hard fast rules and apply it to an infinite number of situations and expect it to be just and/or fair for the majority or even the minority. It is simple math. We have been programmed to believe that there is a victim and a perpetrator, never considering what the alleged perpetrator has been through. Rather than JUSICE we should be focusing on EQUITY. We need to start looking at what humans beings have been through that brings them to where they are and administer help for all people from that place regardless of label. If you commit a heinous act then something is obviously wrong and you should receive help. This is the way forward and anyone who claims otherwise doesn’t really care whether children or adults are sexually assaulted. They merely care about using the alleged offenders to measure their own state of being and as long as they view themselves as better than the alleged offenders, otherwise known as human beings, anything they do is alright in their eyes. All the “dead offenders don’t reoffend’ memes added together have never saved even one child or adult from sexual assault but they do inhibit people from seeking help. We all know that sexual assault is bad folks, we don’t need your self righteous declarations to show us you honestly believe that you’re better than people who offend. That is truly a grade school level of understanding about this problem. God help us all from this antiquated, immature and self righteous blathering that is littering cyber space as it is a large part of the problem.

By: Chris Brown

Chris Brown — Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:25:39 +0000

I can sum up the whole its ” civil not punitive” theory in one sentence,” don’t piss down my back and tell me its raining”
Actually I wouldn’t care about being in the registry if it was truly civil,but the vagueness of the laws allows uneducated
Sferiffs deputies to go lie to a magistrate and get an arrest warrant

By: Chris Brown

Chris Brown — Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:19:19 +0000

If they state says its not punishment,then how to they got by with having felonies everywhere if a “civil law” is broken?

By: lovewillprevail

lovewillprevail — Sat, 15 Jan 2022 21:47:55 +0000

In reply to JMB. I am guessing because public opinion will not support the judges in making the right decision. And besides, it is easier to say Smith vs Doe and dismiss the case.

By: Dr.

Dr. — Sun, 09 Jan 2022 03:36:51 +0000

In reply to Larry T.

Thank you !!!!!!!
Now we need to find a way back to the constitution and bill of rights…
Dr.