FORCED? Not if state has in its possession a standardized waiver of civil rights via plea & record. That signed document means permission given by defendant knowingly. No man can deny the people’s duty to protect itself from attack. IMO the people having a database of known criminal is appropriate given due process, but enslaving man to machine upkeep for life is a bridge to far. Slavery and indentured servitude are historically sever punishment. One judge called it cruel and unusual. I’ll by that for $200.00 Alex.

Something being done outside statutory authority is something being done outside statutory authority. That’s the bottom line here. Whether by a “mistake” or on purpose, the end result is the exact same.

I pray there is something NARSOL can and will do to address this, even if it is sending letters to the special agent in charge of the S.O.R. urging them to make fixing this “coding error” a top priority and placing a notice on the web site warning the public of this error that is resulting in unauthorized and inaccurate information being displayed.

As I understand it, original charges don’t mean squat once they are reduced by plea bargain.

When Was The Last Time a Child Was Abducted on Trick-or-Treat/Halloween?

I Believe it was in 1973…Someone, Please Help Verify This!

Juxtaposed To:
How Many Children Have Been Killed By Drunk Drivers During Trick/Treat/Halloween?
…I Believe it is over 130, But I cannot find the Citation right now…..

Something to Ponder About!

DB….Very True…..BUTTTTT, What I Do, is to Make Sure My Adopted Pit Bull is outside grazing in the Yard-He is a Friendly Fellow But Seems to ‘Ward off the Smells of Burnt Bacon’…Then, of Course, they get pissed off and visited me at one of my subcontracting jobs-They asked me to sign something (toilet paper at best), I asked “them’ for the Numerical Codified Statute; ‘They’ did not answer, and I walked away!

Once Again, Compliance Checks for Those That are not a Ward of the State/Federal Govs, is Made Up PHENOMENA!

Also, it is Trespassing…Also, No One Can Place anything on my residence ever-and if they do, it will be removed immediately and I will sue them for everything under the sun!

Also, it is Littering as well…So, If this Same Sheriff Tells a ‘Person who is Forced to Register’ to Jump off a Bridge, Is That Person Going to Jump off a Bridge? Probably NOT!

I just do not understand why people do not stand up in the first place—ZERO TOLERANCE FOR BS!….-they allow sheeeeet to fester!..Stop it in the beginning!

Yeah. You’re probably right. I expect the same. It’s infuriating when the issues we sometimes win on are ones that the state can simply flip us the bird and legislate their way around our victory in court. You know they do this with maximum glee.

But we don’t want the SCOTUS to grant certiorari to a case with a very poorly or incorrectly framed argument. If that happens, it will be a huge, practically unrecoverable setback for the cause against the disabilities and restraints built into the registry laws of this nation. Look at the potential damage the Willman case did to the great 6th Circuit ruling in Does v. Snyder against Michigan! The 6th Circuit incorrectly found a duty to register at the federal level even though there’s no such thing as a federal registry. Now with new SORNA regulations being finalized, we have yet to see the full scope of what this could mean in the 6th Circuit.

Definitely! Wouldn’t the ruling against the Sheriff mean that his actions with the signs were carried out in bad faith since he knowingly acted outside statutory authority? Doesn’t an act of bad faith negate qualified immunity? If so, clean the county out for the Sheriff’s actions. THAT’S a lesson that will echo loudly state-wide when you successfully clean the county out over a rogue sheriff abusing registered citizens.

The fact that none reoffended in his district is actually not the best argument for us because he could easily claim that it was his efforts and policies that “prevented” any reoffenses.