Comments on: “Don’t turn good intentions into bad policy,” says NARSOL advocate Prizio of CT’s OSJ https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/dont-turn-good-intentions-into-bad-policy-says-narsol-advocate-prizio-of-cts-osj/ National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws Wed, 21 Jun 2023 23:40:55 +0000 hourly 1 By: nmcowboy https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/dont-turn-good-intentions-into-bad-policy-says-narsol-advocate-prizio-of-cts-osj/#comment-29763 Sun, 08 May 2022 08:17:04 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87674#comment-29763 I have mixed feelings you bring more attention to the issue and people are more likely to support it as they now know about it. Maybe it a well meaning person had not said anything it would have been forgotten or not because politicians seem to want to,protect society from now old people that most cases can not do for themselves and live on a fixed income? Well I hope that it not q federal law one day as offenders need that last pit of hope they will have a home in old age no matter what.

]]> By: w https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/dont-turn-good-intentions-into-bad-policy-says-narsol-advocate-prizio-of-cts-osj/#comment-29762 Tue, 03 May 2022 18:38:30 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87674#comment-29762 They don’t care how many lives they ruin. How many cases they need to cover-up. How much they need to bury you in. Or how many people turn their backs on you in your time of need. They got jobs and they get paid, all while being as two-faced as they can handle. They don’t care if your life sucks as long as theirs is well-off. These are the “leaders” on top of everything. And they won’t miss a night’s rest over your problems. Especially now that you’re a bonafide lepper. So if you hope to survive you better get smarter, because their endless tricks come at taxpayer expense. They WILL take your life liberty and property.

]]> By: Tim in WI https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/dont-turn-good-intentions-into-bad-policy-says-narsol-advocate-prizio-of-cts-osj/#comment-29761 Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:18:44 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87674#comment-29761 Talk about a line with punch!
“Pri—- said, there’s no need to create a new bill every time there is an isolated high-profile incident” and that the bill is unfair to a class of people who already have had their resources “sucked dry by the system.”

Is he talking, all of America or just sex offenders? His focus is on offenders. Ironically they both conclude a “work group ” is necessary which also requires resources. But who works for free? I can only wonder if the DDI will be useful to that end. One thing is sure, you cannot house an old sex offender on a database.

]]>