<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Some to be removed from sex offender registry in South Carolina	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/some-to-be-removed-from-sex-offender-registry-in-south-carolina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/some-to-be-removed-from-sex-offender-registry-in-south-carolina/</link>
	<description>National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2023 00:34:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: F-Texas		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/some-to-be-removed-from-sex-offender-registry-in-south-carolina/#comment-24296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F-Texas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 03:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=87679#comment-24296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would be great if Texas would honor what they agreed to also. Retroactive laws and rules should be illegal. It was a bait and switch. It’s not right and they need to correct it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if Texas would honor what they agreed to also. Retroactive laws and rules should be illegal. It was a bait and switch. It’s not right and they need to correct it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim in WI		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/04/some-to-be-removed-from-sex-offender-registry-in-south-carolina/#comment-24286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim in WI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=87679#comment-24286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is useful here is the fact that these men went to the record to prove the unconstitutional nature of state&#039;s use of the sex offender databases. &quot;Registry&quot; is a marketing driven choice of word. Simply put, it is a government database. And it is intended to impose broad affirmative restraint, making it very similar to the intent of incarceration. The men involved in this case report &quot;A profound impact&quot; from the peoples database regime. However, the profound impact of the database driven infrastructure upon the people is not limited to the sex offender. The sex offender was merely the first group to be enslaved to the machine&#039;s maintenance for life. Too bad the people were so easily convinced to swear off the sovereignty of the sex offender just so the rest of their own liberty from government surveillance and intrusion went collateralized right along with the offender. If some doubt the DDI could be used to make surveillance saints appear falsely benevolent perhaps they should look to the Governor Whitmer kidnapping conspiracy saga as an example. That jury will disagree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is useful here is the fact that these men went to the record to prove the unconstitutional nature of state&#8217;s use of the sex offender databases. &#8220;Registry&#8221; is a marketing driven choice of word. Simply put, it is a government database. And it is intended to impose broad affirmative restraint, making it very similar to the intent of incarceration. The men involved in this case report &#8220;A profound impact&#8221; from the peoples database regime. However, the profound impact of the database driven infrastructure upon the people is not limited to the sex offender. The sex offender was merely the first group to be enslaved to the machine&#8217;s maintenance for life. Too bad the people were so easily convinced to swear off the sovereignty of the sex offender just so the rest of their own liberty from government surveillance and intrusion went collateralized right along with the offender. If some doubt the DDI could be used to make surveillance saints appear falsely benevolent perhaps they should look to the Governor Whitmer kidnapping conspiracy saga as an example. That jury will disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
