Comments on: IN Court of Appeals hands down disappointing decision https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/ National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws Sat, 22 Jul 2023 00:34:32 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jeffrey Lou Whalen https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24376 Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:20:47 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24376 Someone needs to wake the “f” up. You are looking down the wrong rabbit hole. It is not about ex post facto in this case, rather it’s about a violation of the separation of powers doctrine. If the individual was convicted and the case was closed prior to a new sex offender law being passed, that means the legislative body cannot re-open a previously closed court case. Look up Plaut v. Spendthrift Farms, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995) and you will find all the proof that you need to claim a position of unconstitutionally placing a person on the sex offender registry AFTER he was already convicted. It is a violation of Art III of the U. S. Constitution to reopen a previously closed court case and Plaut says the legislature and executive branches are FORBIDDEN from doing that stuff. It’s Unconstitutional people, quite looking at ex post facto and start looking for separation of powers violations instead.

]]> By: Jbx https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24373 Sat, 06 Aug 2022 00:59:56 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24373 We are nearing 2023 now, and looking back over the years of court rulings and legislative actions, does anybody today still believe that progress is being made as it regards registry issues? It is quite easy to see that there is virtually no support for registered citizens, and there shall be none that will be enough to effect change. It has been far too propgandized, and it is financially lucrative for too many, so the hamster wheel spins and spins. Even those in places of authority, who have the ability to help bring change will not touch this issue. It is political, career, and financial suicide to stand for constitutional justice when it comes to the sex offender registry. On top of that Americs has just become a mean spirited and bloodthirsty nation.

]]> By: Brian Hope https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24372 Fri, 29 Jul 2022 21:02:27 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24372 Yo! My case isn’t over yet! we just won again in the district court and apparently we will have the same three justices as last time when the state appealed to the seventh circuit. While there are no guarantees, I feel like we may win and that the court may deny an en banc if the state loses.Which that leaves the Supreme Court and it’s doubtful they will hear the case

]]> By: Derek https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24370 Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:54:12 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24370 We need to get cases to the supreme court they are ready to bring the registry down

]]> By: Dustin https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24367 Tue, 31 May 2022 19:57:07 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24367 Hmm. Punitive if required to register if the crime was committed before the registry was in effect, but not punitive if required to register anywhere else for whatever reason. Kind of like someone hitting your hand with a hammer while swinging at a nail wouldn’t hurt like it would if he were swinging at a tent peg.

Clear as mud.

]]> By: Tim in WI https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24366 Sun, 29 May 2022 13:22:08 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24366 The only real reason to be disappointed is if you had hope to begin with. These six have found the same outcome of those in Michigan irrespective of the differing outcome from the two courts. Even when you win the case liberty is still divorced from the registrants reality. Make no mistake the duty to register is a form of indentured servitude. This being the precise difference between the people having a database versus the people having a database plus demanding upkeep which abridges liberty by default.

]]> By: A Mistake They Made https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24365 Fri, 27 May 2022 15:48:29 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24365 In reply to Anonymous.

I hope so it is unconstitutional, and wrong. They know this and just want to do what they want to do, and that is punish until death. The sex offender registry is punishment you cannot change words to make it not so!

]]> By: Anonymous https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24364 Thu, 26 May 2022 21:01:37 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24364 So it seem the problem was Doe challenge the State court rather Federal court and the State simply ruled the way they did because his requirement to be on register comes from Michigan not their State. I wonder he appeal to Federal court if this could be overturn.

]]> By: A Mistake They Made https://www.narsol.org/2022/05/in-court-of-appeals-hands-down-disappointing-decision/#comment-24363 Thu, 26 May 2022 16:40:09 +0000 https://narsol.org/?p=87946#comment-24363 Indiana home of the kangaroo court! I follow the cases every day in Indiana, and have noted such ridiculous decisions as “Spirit of the Law”, and “We do not need evidence, if it is an attempted offence” They need to Take it to the Indiana Kangaroo Supreme court they will say the same thing then go Federal to get real unbiased justice.

]]>