<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: N.C. press release: &#8220;Outrageous&#8221; to ban state&#8217;s registered citizens from state fair	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/</link>
	<description>National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Oswaldo		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/#comment-32715</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oswaldo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 04:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=89167#comment-32715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/#comment-32710&quot;&gt;Tim in WI&lt;/a&gt;.

State fair attendance is also not allowed for sex offenders in Oklahoma.  I&#039;m 64, and I don&#039;t remember a single case of a child being abducted or molested at the fair. But I have heard about sex offender arrests just for being at the fair.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/#comment-32710">Tim in WI</a>.</p>
<p>State fair attendance is also not allowed for sex offenders in Oklahoma.  I&#8217;m 64, and I don&#8217;t remember a single case of a child being abducted or molested at the fair. But I have heard about sex offender arrests just for being at the fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A Mistake They Made		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/#comment-32713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Mistake They Made]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=89167#comment-32713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your efforts Robin!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your efforts Robin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger Kincade		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/#comment-32711</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Kincade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=89167#comment-32711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The importance of using person-first language as we communicate with others cannot be over-emphasized.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The importance of using person-first language as we communicate with others cannot be over-emphasized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim in WI		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/#comment-32710</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim in WI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=89167#comment-32710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robin so your statement means NC Congress has no respect for what was judged wrong by the court. Is that any different from what has occurred already n Michigan State v. Rankin? No! 
SCOTUS had to opportunity to regulate Congress in Alaska( Smith) V Doh. By neglecting SCOTUS&#039;s own obligation to the people to reject the use of prospective language upon crimes in statutes  by congressional actors they surrendered their solemn authority to compel. Is it any wonder why we see an unregulated Congress who&#039;s unresponsive to judicial determination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin so your statement means NC Congress has no respect for what was judged wrong by the court. Is that any different from what has occurred already n Michigan State v. Rankin? No!<br />
SCOTUS had to opportunity to regulate Congress in Alaska( Smith) V Doh. By neglecting SCOTUS&#8217;s own obligation to the people to reject the use of prospective language upon crimes in statutes  by congressional actors they surrendered their solemn authority to compel. Is it any wonder why we see an unregulated Congress who&#8217;s unresponsive to judicial determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: H n H		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2022/10/n-c-press-release-outrageous-to-ban-states-registered-citizens-from-state-fair/#comment-32709</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H n H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=89167#comment-32709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I see the emphasis on &quot;those no longer under supervision&quot; quite a bit here. The problem with that being that parole can be for life. Even if the sentence isn&#039;t even 2 yrs, you fought the charges, they trumped everything up, blowing everything out of proportion in hopes of securing a conviction. You continue to fight everything as everyone laughs. Meanwhile the system has you in their sights and you just marginally fall into that little sliver of the convicted that are now wards of the state for life. The registry is moot at this point because parole is even worse. I don&#039;t see how prohibiting someone on parole or probation is any doing any more good than those on the registry. Courts have a strong love affair with lifetime parole. Go murder someone and your life will be better off in the long run than if you are caught up in something sex related. Lifetime parole should be illegal, along with the registry and all the witch hunts that go along with them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the emphasis on &#8220;those no longer under supervision&#8221; quite a bit here. The problem with that being that parole can be for life. Even if the sentence isn&#8217;t even 2 yrs, you fought the charges, they trumped everything up, blowing everything out of proportion in hopes of securing a conviction. You continue to fight everything as everyone laughs. Meanwhile the system has you in their sights and you just marginally fall into that little sliver of the convicted that are now wards of the state for life. The registry is moot at this point because parole is even worse. I don&#8217;t see how prohibiting someone on parole or probation is any doing any more good than those on the registry. Courts have a strong love affair with lifetime parole. Go murder someone and your life will be better off in the long run than if you are caught up in something sex related. Lifetime parole should be illegal, along with the registry and all the witch hunts that go along with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
