Take this for example:
The sobering data
It’s bad however you look at it.

Firearm injuries are now the leading cause of death among people younger than 24 in the United States, according to a study published in the December 2022 edition of Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

From 2015 through 2020, there were at least 2,070 unintentional shootings by children under 18 in the US, according to a report from Everytown. Those shootings resulted in 765 deaths and 1,366 injuries.

An unequal burden. A study published late last year in JAMA Network Open analyzed firearm deaths over the past three decades – a total of more than 1 million lives lost since 1990.

The researchers found that firearm mortality rates increased for most demographic groups in recent years – especially during the Covid-19 pandemic – but vast disparities persisted. The homicide rate among young Black men – 142 homicide deaths for every 100,000 Black men ages 20 to 24 – was nearly 10 times higher than the overall firearm death rate in the US in 2021.

But gun violence doesn’t warrant parole supervision for life. Just 3 or 5 years, depending on how crowded or booked the system is, and how well your lawyer did on your case.

And the drunk drivers don’t have to register even after they kill or seriously injure someone. They don’t have to inform the sheriff’s department if they change vehicles or license plate numbers. They don’t have to tell the sheriff’s department what bars they frequent or where they’re going to a party. And they kill over 10000 people a year.

I would think that they believe it is worse. Someone can kill another person and never be on a registry. This seems to be the easiest argument but no one takes it to the folks that “need/want” a registry. how many DWI/DUI that have killed someone or hurt someone are on a registry? How many people that have commit home invasion robberies?

yes and it continues to exist even though known perpetrators, who have positioned themselves in the other tier of justice by money and influence (such as prince andrew and those still unknown via jeffrey epstein and ghislaine maxwell) are not required to report, exemplify are more than one provable reality of nonprosecution caused by privilege, influence and money should be enough to invalidate the registry and the two tier nonjustice and abuse it represents…

I don’t think Mr. Vander Wall is using the correct arguments here. To say it’s “unfair” or “unjust” will definitely fall on deaf ears. The general public believes we deserve anything and everything they can punish us with. The proper argument would be to point out that the registry is supposed to be a “safety” tool and it fails miserably in that regard. It should also be pointed out that the ostracization of the registry not only affects the former offender, but anyone in his or her household and his or her employer. This includes the former offender’s children. The other proper argument would be the fact that the registry was ONLY declared constitutional because it’s a “civil regulatory scheme” i.e. NOT punishment. Therefore, all arguments for or against it being punishment are irrelevant. The only arguments that matter is if it does what it’s supposed to do… It doesn’t.

In presenting these arguments, I would suggest having concrete facts from peer reviewed studies (with citations) at the ready, such as the 5.3% recidivism rate. I would also compare the rate of recidivism prior to and after implementation of the registry to show no significant change.

We are not going to change the hearts and minds of people who hate us for what we did by asking them not to hate us. We can only change it by showing the ineffectiveness of their current “solution”