Comments on: Chemical castration as public policy gets a failing grade

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 17 Apr 2023 05:38:25 +0000

I wonder whether anyone has considered that this might violate the equal protection clause, since it apparently only applies to men, not women.

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:48:18 +0000

Dear Sandy,
About 30 yrs. ago I put a simple question to a NYU “change agent” what n a large groups circle of apps 60 persons in a prison setting.
Is a pediatrician who practices circumcision guilty of performing genital mutilation?
How many defense attorneys ask that very line of questions in trials?
My point is, this his how the established, patch and the rest, play the game.
It’s the capitalisation from of perception of the non reality.
Behold the infamous story telling to our children’s environment. Most are committed in 1 jurisdiction yet the feds are automatically in every one of these large group shooting scenarios. The fed and internet & DDI will fix it? Me thinx not. No doubt castration has been suggested and used in history. If Congress goes that route it would’ve been based on manifest necessity. Just like the database driven infrastructure & now database driven currencies. A result of social construct, unfettered use and application of the machine.

By: Ed C

Ed C — Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:11:52 +0000

The New Mexico legislative session ends at noon today, 3/18/2023. Due to the efforts of the local NARSOL affilliate, i.e. Liberty & Justice Coalition, and its partners the chemical castration bill did not even clear the first committee. It is effectively dead until next year. The same coalition was successful in removing a requirement that someone convicted of bestiality be required to register as a sex offender. The amended bestiality bill passed unanimously even though that act is already unlawful under existing animal cruelty laws.

By: John

John — Thu, 16 Mar 2023 17:51:43 +0000

That’s funny, it looks like a couple of these states that have chemical castration on the books are also against allowing children to take hormone blockers or hormones. This is the same type of drug they give people to change their gender is it not?

By: Screwed over

Screwed over — Thu, 09 Feb 2023 22:55:03 +0000

As long as there are tv shows that push the narrative that all ppl on the registry are raping babies then laws like this will keep coming up. I know there are ppl who need real help. I know there are some really messed up ppl out there. But there are so many ppl on the registry that have stupid ass reasons they have to register for. But no one sees that it’s juat the horrific crimes that anyone sees.

By: A Mistake They Made

A Mistake They Made — Wed, 08 Feb 2023 17:44:31 +0000

Also I cant wait until they do this to someone who is later found innocent, and I hope they financially destroy the State for it!

By: TS

TS — Mon, 06 Feb 2023 19:28:07 +0000

I have had to sit on this article and let it ferment for a bit before coming to this conclusion:

This is barbaric and reminiscent of middle ages when such tortuous ideas were actually implemented and even through until the current age when such physical punishments are levied against persons overseas. What the hell has this country come to?! Has it lost its ever loving mind?! I believe, sadly, it has regressed and is continuing to regress instead of progressing as our forefathers wanted us to do.

While I understand those who are suggesting these punishments want to do harm in the name of safety to justify it, this is insane. It reminds of me of the Old Testament, eye for an eye, whatever that equals to. The altitude is getting to those in Santa Fe.

By: w

Sat, 04 Feb 2023 04:59:17 +0000

This country was ruined. They just keep managing to cover it all up in a nice package and hope that nobody notices the real motives. It’s a sad, rotten, ugly, truth. They’re all connected, it’s a heavily entrenched and well insulated network. And people are being abused by the system.

By: WC_TN

WC_TN — Fri, 03 Feb 2023 03:16:56 +0000

There are very serious medical side-effects that come with chemical castration.
1. Insulin resistance/hyperglycemia/diabetes…what about PFRs who have to take this injection who are already diabetic? It will accelerate the progress of the disease with devastating consequences.
2. Increased cardiovascular morbidity
3. Reduced bone mass density which is a functional equivalent of osteoporosis, which means broken hips, spinal column deterioration….
These side-effects, if fairly and honestly evaluated by the courts, would mean they would be prohibited because the “treatment” is clearly violative of the 8th Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

By: WC_TN

WC_TN — Fri, 03 Feb 2023 03:12:36 +0000

In reply to A Mistake They Made.

They have thrown away the rule book for sex offenders only because the public doesn’t care until they themselves become ensnared in the life-destroying machine that is the sex offender registry”

That’s the key right there. They don’t care. Plain and simple. They don’t just follow what voters want. They also follow their own animus because they’re parents, grandparents, cousins, aunts, uncles, etc. themselves.