mut,
What happens my friend is this. It’s not different than what we see the professional treatment providers with all the issues.
The regimes prescribed by socialist thinking in a capitalist system specifically tend to be about group reciprocity rather than affecting the changes the people need or demand. In this scenario socialists’ feed one another through law or policy.
Because their social predilection of the socialist is to self sustain comes first, ineffective or less effective policy results. Because the policy is generally ineffective changes naturally result expanding the range or scope of the policy with hopes of increasing effectiveness. SOR is a prime example!
However in the long run, expanding but ineffective policies begin to get more expensive and less bang for the buck is rendered. Flaws in any given policies’ foundation begin to get exposed for the people to plainly see. Because the socialist is determined to maintain their favored policies’ position despite its obvious failure, they turn to others to make it cheaper, less costly to maintain. This will relieve the tax payer from the burden of dealing with criminal element* by giving the duty to privatization to cope with instead to the taxpayers. Essentially the socialist hires a fascist ( A pure capitalist) to cover their foundationally flawed social policy.
Thus we see ankle bracelets which are factually “leased properties” and not property owned by the people whole. The purveyors of said ankle bracelets, in all reality, play a similar role that of Mr. Schindler in “Schinldler’s list.” He was and they are able to capitalize on free labor created by laws and policy in Germany and now America.
I believe the purveyors of SOR are of the same ilk. But how to prove it……IN COURT!
*A better word may be “unwanted elements”

I ask my twins me about constitutional rights and I get” huh, you mean…giberish.” However lets us not confuse a reasonable expectation of right AFTER you’ve waived civil rights by waiver in a court of law by your own choice. It is one thing to ” teach the constitution ” and quite another to adhere to its limitations.

Legislatures don’t care about this topic but only the voting cred they will garner from the public for efforts like this during elections. If they are held personally accountable by the public for frivolous spending of monies to defend losing efforts, then they may understand. But the public does not understand the financial aspect because the govt will just keep borrowing and taking from others to fund these habits. Staff is in place to do jobs like this at the expense of other more important matters, but people don’t care.

Raise the fear level here, as they are doing, with this only to see it stricken down. FLA is walking a dangerous path to a lawsuit, a very expensive lawsuit. I hope they do pass it so it will be sued with an injunction to stop it upon the “guvnah” signature with appeals all the way to the 11th CCOA to slap them back into place for that neck of the woods. IF FLA is so heat stricken then to appeal to SCOTUS for a national policy precedent against monikers like this, then so be it. It would be a wonderful thing and useful in many different ways.