Comments on: Arizona RSOL: Changes needed in sexual offense policies

By: Convicted Witch

Convicted Witch — Tue, 04 Jul 2023 02:34:12 +0000

I have read a lot of great stuff in these posts! Amen to everyone who has posted ! I agree wholeheartedly . The fact is the ones who create and support the SOR are no better than the slave traders ! They did not and do not care how the SOR affects the registrants or their families . They darn well know the SOR does not protect the public . Their primary agenda is financial gain and prestige . And in order to achieve their goal they have to make the public believe the SOR is protecting their children from a bunch of kidnapping, raping, murdering pedophiles . And the public sees anyone labelled Sex Offender as just that . And they hate anyone on the list . Which frees them up to be able to pass any Despotic Unconstitutional law they can come up with against the registrants . In turn making them a Hero . And governors appoint justices of the Supreme Court who share their agenda . I am afraid to leave my state for fear of breaking some asinine unknown law to me . The SOR is a modern day Witch Hunt ! As long as they stand to gain by chastising the SO they will not change their tactics and certainly not do away with the SOR . What can we do ? Pray to God for true justice .

By: Mike

Mike — Sun, 18 Jun 2023 07:00:22 +0000

The judges, lawmakers, Da’s and Cop’s will only see the truth if they are put on the registry for 1yr, but what also would really help a lot is to enact laws on Lawmakers, Judges, Da, & Policeman that says: if they enact and/enforce these laws knowing there wrong & unconstitutional, ECT, will be punished & the law gets upheld and amended. Then you’ll see the real truth being spoken and not just going along with the laws because they get a kickback, plus all laws should have to show evidence of a certain percentage to enact and/or taken down, they have no evidence that the registry is needed, in 1994 the us government authorized and allowed a study on sex offender recidivism and the results were : 5.3 but the us government enacted the law anyways in 1995. I say we as citizens should gather all studies on recidivism and take it to supreme court’s and all protest and show that most of those laws are based on complete false accusations, I bet the laws will definitely be taken down.

By: Tom Chambers

Tom Chambers — Sat, 27 May 2023 21:50:14 +0000

Sex offenders will face more and more onerous
laws and regulations as the current Supreme Court will not protect or support sex offenders. As the Republican Party continues to elect the likes of Ron Desantis and his ilk, people on the registry cannot expect that it will go away. I support Narsol. I have been on the registry. It was not fun. I am off now thanks to the PA Supreme Court. It was a lucky break for me and others. I fear that this break will not be passed on to others on the registry and my heart goes out to you. But the fact is without support from the U S Supreme Court, the registry will get more intrusive and more pervasive for those who commit sex offenses.

By: T Moore

T Moore — Wed, 24 May 2023 14:14:10 +0000

In reply to Tim in WI.

The system turns people into property of the state, but it doesn’t end there. This “property” then enters the market and is used to make private firms money — the surveillance and control machinery. Much of surveillance and research could not have been done without a class of people without human rights to experiment on.

By: Jim from Indy

Jim from Indy — Mon, 22 May 2023 23:56:02 +0000

Hating those who even once committed some form of sexual offense is fuel for politicians. These elected “representatives” don’t undo their legislation especially when it continues to feed public fear and gains them votes to remain in office. Retaining office is their sole priority, NOT protecting the public. The experts have spoken, yet regardless of the truth, politicians will not follow expert finding. None will make any move that will lose them votes..

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Mon, 22 May 2023 19:08:11 +0000

In reply to Derek.

Derek,
They will fight to the death to defend the machines use. Slavery as a means of production! version 2.0. There is nothing thing new about slavery. And there is nothing new about the concept of involuntary servitude!
Not so suddenly half of the 13th amendment evaporated as per the purveyors of the SOR regime.
Supreme Court weighs in on internet accountability.
Yea right!

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Mon, 22 May 2023 18:18:39 +0000

Over and over again, I will tell you. It was never about recidivism! It was about how far you can go with a gov database! How may the people apply it to daily life. The industry purveyors sought and received special adjustments in law to lend unfettered use and unchecked application of the ubiquitous machine database. Simply put, the same invented the highly generalized, high recidivism rates as the way to establish a foundation ( means of production) for the machines unchecked use. If you ( A people) can impose involuntary servitude upon the human against their will AND use it to restrict liberty of the individual, what more needs said. We are moving to a digital dollar and the sex offender regime helped paved the way. I told ya; The fascist purveyors have big plans indeed for their ubiquitous properties.

By: Pamela Scott

Pamela Scott — Mon, 22 May 2023 05:44:15 +0000

I just heard a very profound comment by Brett Weinstein on Joe Rogan’s podcast. He said, you can’t pay attention to an organization’s stated purpose, goal, plan, intention, or mission. Pay attention to what it DOES. Police brutality is not a bug in the system – it’s a feature. In this same vein, when every single thing a “registered” individual encounters feels like punishment, has the same outcomes as punishment (jail, restrictions on travel, movement, privacy), and is accompanied by public shaming, then registration is NOT a public safety tool. Ostracism, failure, and despair are not bugs in the SOR scheme, they are features. Foolhardy, expensive, dangerous misuse of taxpayer’s dollars that would be better spent preventing sexual abuse by educating, protecting, and empowering children, women, and families..

By: Don Kellough

Don Kellough — Mon, 22 May 2023 02:21:38 +0000

In reply to Shawn. I fully agree! The mandatory treatment for offenders if ran by those who hold to the belief that offenders cannot change. I was fortunate to have the only therapist among them that believed the opposite. The system lumps all offenders in one big bowl. I made a horrid choice to look at underage porn that I should not have. I never downloaded, bought, sold, traded, joined….I looked. That was wrong. But lifetime registration? That is wrong and overkill. But few care about any offender or laws concerning them.

By: Shawn

Shawn — Sun, 21 May 2023 18:50:44 +0000

In reply to Jerald Torkelson.

Have you had sex offender treatment? It is not treatment. It is just a program made up by someone to get money from the government. Do you know they rate a person’s recidivism based on things like 1 . Your a man. That 10 points against you. 2. Your over 30. That’s another ten. Your victim was under 18. That’s another 10 points even it Your victim was 15 and you where 17. These are not the exact percentages. But it is an example of the system they use.
It’s not a system that rates on the level of violence. It will add points if there are multiple counts. You know a d.a. is going make up multiple counts. They don’t even have to have actual dates. They use on or about. So if you say I was out of town at that time they say we’ll it was about that time.
Hell I could come up with a better treatment plan then the one they use in Texas.
They just shun a person a label them. It’s not a positive system when they put you in a group and make you tell everyone what you did. They constantly remind you what a low down p.o.s. that you are.
I don’t see how the system they use could have any effect on recidivism.