Comments on: Flock surveillance cameras are “political theatre” says NARSOL

By: w

Thu, 01 Jun 2023 06:56:19 +0000

The surveillance is happening, by any and all means. If not this way then that way, it seems that they always find a way to their end goal: a predatory system meant to intimidate people. It’s a complete and total waste of tax payer money, yet it easily gets the funding when the police and the law makers team up to produce those gut-wrenching presentations full of dramatic “reenactments” and scare tactics. Especially the National Crime Victims Farce, they sure did get everything they ever dreamed and hoped for. All it costed them was totally destroying the families of the accused and stripping them of any rights to decency.

Good job America!

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Thu, 18 May 2023 00:33:08 +0000

In reply to George Simmonds.

Good point,
Private enterprise wrestling away that responsibility which constitutionally belongs to the people’s whole sovereignty. Regulation of the people’s belongs to the people’s themselves (gov) and not smaller private parties. The people are foolish enough to do so, and thereby elect fascism. The purveyors of database offer human dependency and not human independence! Convenience at the price of protection rackets.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 16 May 2023 03:08:07 +0000

Domestic Terrorism. Period

By: CJ in TN

CJ in TN — Sun, 14 May 2023 16:33:59 +0000

The fact that police can drop surveillance cameras anywhere at any time is troubling to me. I see them everywhere. The fact that they are present implies a back-end database where all data is collected and stored indefinitely. This should be troubling to everyone.

By: TS

TS — Sun, 14 May 2023 16:09:19 +0000

Just like London, England, greater PHX area is becoming London of the west with these systems.

By: WC_TN

WC_TN — Sun, 14 May 2023 13:08:58 +0000

I don’t think anything will change unless the FLOCK camera usage can be attacked legally. No one cares if they specially track PFRs.That is viewed as innovative in our case.

By: SW

SW — Sun, 14 May 2023 13:07:53 +0000

One of the many scary parts of AI is the abuse of it by actors, “good” or “bad”. Its difficult to feel hopeful of the future with such technology and attitudes in place.

By: George Simmonds

George Simmonds — Sun, 14 May 2023 12:51:00 +0000

Is 1984, big brother is watching and big brother is not fair or nice about it either.

By: mut

mut — Sun, 14 May 2023 07:43:42 +0000

the seemingly differientiated treatment of travelling citizens brings that bad ass indianna federal case to my shrivelling mind — tolle it like it is. i remain estatic.
but anyway …

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Sun, 14 May 2023 04:39:26 +0000

I’ve said it many times, SOR is the foundation of federal electronic domestic surveillance. Cameras are fine, but its the collection and storage of images ( data) that matters.
So without the database in the equation cameras are mostly harmless. I do not think anyone can stop the people from operating a database mug book, but enslaving the human to their maintaining for life is another matter. Since when does involuntary servitude to a property not punishment. According to the 13th amendment involuntary servitude is punishment. Who would want the inherent servitude defined otherwise?
The purveyors, and only the purveyors.