<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NARSOL conference 2023: It’s a wrap	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.narsol.org/2023/06/narsol-conference-2023-its-a-wrap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.narsol.org/2023/06/narsol-conference-2023-its-a-wrap/</link>
	<description>National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim in WI		</title>
		<link>https://www.narsol.org/2023/06/narsol-conference-2023-its-a-wrap/#comment-41424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim in WI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://narsol.org/?p=91352#comment-41424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on another assembly of like minded as to the registry. A sex offender registry is a very peculiar use of the  database. It was the first example of human indentured servant to a database machine. The involuntary servitude inherent in the regime reflects the people&#039;s traditional intent. But that retributive intent has been denied by our leadership from Congress to the highest courts.(1994-2003) Therefore a question  is begged. Was the SOR database regime intended to divide the people or was the intent to unite the people? 
We already know the people (Ds&#038;Rs+Is, respectively) were united behind in their intent to use the database to divide some Americans (the sex offender) from others.
United in their intent to divide the nation and he are.
The ultimate question is:
Who would benefit most from such an all encompassing human disposition relative to the database machine? Surely not the whole of the people, some are divided out at the foundation of the &quot; new&quot; thing or regime. It must be a few who benefit most from attempts to install trust in the database driven infrastructure, faith in it&#039;s accuracy, its security and it&#039;s fairness. Those who would benefit from unfettered application, use and access to the ubiquitous machine. Many believe a recent election was &quot;stolen&quot; via the database driven electronic polling and so forth. And why shouldn&#039;t they? In America anything is possible. Because in America everything is for sale at the right price. In 1994 the child molesters and rapists were the first Americans sold out to the purveyors of database property benevolence but the rest of the people went right along, they just didn&#039;t know it. And the purveyors certainly didn&#039;t want to shine light on this inevitable truth. Is see the current Administration is proposing a 40B investment in high speed internet access for the people. As if big tech firms do not have the private funds to do so. Come On Man!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on another assembly of like minded as to the registry. A sex offender registry is a very peculiar use of the  database. It was the first example of human indentured servant to a database machine. The involuntary servitude inherent in the regime reflects the people&#8217;s traditional intent. But that retributive intent has been denied by our leadership from Congress to the highest courts.(1994-2003) Therefore a question  is begged. Was the SOR database regime intended to divide the people or was the intent to unite the people?<br />
We already know the people (Ds&amp;Rs+Is, respectively) were united behind in their intent to use the database to divide some Americans (the sex offender) from others.<br />
United in their intent to divide the nation and he are.<br />
The ultimate question is:<br />
Who would benefit most from such an all encompassing human disposition relative to the database machine? Surely not the whole of the people, some are divided out at the foundation of the &#8221; new&#8221; thing or regime. It must be a few who benefit most from attempts to install trust in the database driven infrastructure, faith in it&#8217;s accuracy, its security and it&#8217;s fairness. Those who would benefit from unfettered application, use and access to the ubiquitous machine. Many believe a recent election was &#8220;stolen&#8221; via the database driven electronic polling and so forth. And why shouldn&#8217;t they? In America anything is possible. Because in America everything is for sale at the right price. In 1994 the child molesters and rapists were the first Americans sold out to the purveyors of database property benevolence but the rest of the people went right along, they just didn&#8217;t know it. And the purveyors certainly didn&#8217;t want to shine light on this inevitable truth. Is see the current Administration is proposing a 40B investment in high speed internet access for the people. As if big tech firms do not have the private funds to do so. Come On Man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
