Comments on: Sex offender residency restrictions: bad, bad public policy https://www.narsol.org/2025/02/sex-offender-residency-restrictions-bad-bad-public-policy/ National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws Fri, 07 Feb 2025 21:53:29 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tim in WI https://www.narsol.org/2025/02/sex-offender-residency-restrictions-bad-bad-public-policy/#comment-45479 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 21:53:29 +0000 https://www.narsol.org/?p=97722#comment-45479 In reply to Tim in WI.

People,
The deal with the database driven infrastructure is the fact it, on the whole, is equally as dangerous to human liberty and civility independent of which trending ideology happens to be in charge if it. The DDI is a very powerful tool and indeed a serious threat to civility when it’s uses are left unchecked.
This is why it was so important NOT to begin with enslaving the citizenry to it’s ever incessant maintenance by law. The machines are properties, people are not. Many are proclaiming the end of democracy when maybe its the end of a republic. Maybe it’s the time when re:publica becomes re:machina.
And quite frankly by their own volition.

]]> By: Tim in WI https://www.narsol.org/2025/02/sex-offender-residency-restrictions-bad-bad-public-policy/#comment-45473 Wed, 05 Feb 2025 04:58:12 +0000 https://www.narsol.org/?p=97722#comment-45473 Imagine trying to impose the affirmative restraint and disability residence restrictions without a public sex offender registry. The banishment would be much !more difficult to enforce. Nevertheless, the community banishment is another historical form of punishment and reflects the obfuscated original intent underpinning the use of the database driven regime in the first cause. The regime was plainly meant to impose additional bars upon the already convicted.

]]>