Comments on: Florida Action Committee Condemns Sheriff’s Office for Evicting Registrants as “Perverts”

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:35:13 +0000

Ohio is moving to give the people a vote to end qualified immunity. See it at Lehtoslaw@youtube or on the Associated Press website. This must go nation wide ASAP!

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:41:26 +0000

The ruling the Supreme Court just made with respect to the unlawful deportation of the Venezuelan man about Due Process necessity has implications for my 1992 case. Deportation & SOR are each civil regulatory regimes which require Substantive Due Process before implementing (Kentucky v Padilla, 2002) This recent ruling has opened the door for Pre-act (SOR) defendants who had not waived their rights via plea & standard waivers to confront the Administrators who unlawfully imposed the registration requirement without the opportunity to contest by direct appeal subsequent to conviction. One cannot contest by direct appeal consequences which were not on the table at the time.
This is also the substantive claim oddly mentioned and referred to but not weighed in Connecticut DPS Procedural due process case.

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:12:24 +0000

In reply to Sandy Rozek.

Self sustained bureaucracy collecting data for the sake of the collecting alone. Precisely why socialism inevitably collapses the costly overhead. Those people are pawns in Machiavellian terms. Meanwhile, the Sheriff’s Dept. gets to publicly ” dab.”
Sinful.

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:04:33 +0000

In reply to Patrick.

Patrick,
Inevitable, given the unfettered use of a database prescribed by the data bros and the rest of the electronic tech sector. SOR was about virtue signaling for ALL database driven enterprises. To lend faith in it for the people to believe in it’s virtues.
Having a database is one concept; enslaving the human to the machine’s repetitive maintenance is another.

By: Sandy Rozek

Sandy Rozek — Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:38:27 +0000

Written perfectly! “Municipalities pass these misguided ordinances and then complain about the unintended consequences they created themselves.” Exactly!

By: Patrick

Patrick — Sun, 16 Mar 2025 03:21:03 +0000

I see the U.S. heading into a police state day by day. The moment you make laws hindering one group or labeling as so called “dangerous,” then people out there have no idea who or what group they will label next. I know it seems I rant every post, everything is just about money and nothing else. The public needs to know that. Misinformation is all they know how to do. A person is more likely to get shot by a stray bullet than a S.O. running around doing so called “dangerous” stuff (and yes I know it happens, but it’s rare.)

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:25:17 +0000

An informed public is a safer public! Says the flat Earth crowd.
So Florida state law enforcement created the gathering problem in the first place, then creates more work for themselves by forced dispersal. Sounds like grounds for some kind of civil suit. Condemnation goes only so far. Nevertheless the consistent propaganda about sex offenders props up an illogical police state.
I see Illinois is contemplating a bill to make a 250 ft school zone residence restriction and ISP, Illinois State Police are opposing the proposed law. I believe they fear conflict would ensue which brings officers into harms way.
And Wisconsin Supreme Court election Ads are underpinned with the topic of child sex offenders. Each claiming the other is too extreme for WI. We know what the former Attorney General who unlawfully attached bracelets to sex offenders without judicial order will do to the constitution. He’ll shred it, similar to the Sheriff’s Office in FL. A digitally enhanced police state.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Thu, 06 Mar 2025 23:00:35 +0000

Unbelievable that people in Florida and anywhere else have to deal with wasted time and money that protects no one. We all have all done our time and should be permitted to live a normal life. What’s the point of supervised release then? As I said in one of my posts… How long is it going to be before they start saying other people are just as dangerous and should be on some type of list or monitoring software? People should be calling their representatives about these issues. It’s only a matter of time before it heads in that direction.

By: FactsShouldMatter

FactsShouldMatter — Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:22:53 +0000

Hurling disparaging epithets does nothing to protect children. It’s a tactic that’s intentionally done by LEOs. Then the local news bites every time and sane-washes the whole thing as legit. It’s a perpetual vilification feedback loop.

By: TS

TS — Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:13:47 +0000

In reply to J L. The good sheriff should look at the stats of those who are in positions of trust, such as LE and those around him professionally as well as personally, before speaking since they are more likely to commit an offense then a person with sex conviction is to repeat their offense. They should wonder who in their office is committing a sex offense that has not been caught either as a member of LE or in their homes or both. Casting a stone in a glass house while yelling the loudest is surely going to break a pane of glass while hiding what they may already know about the LE community in this vein.