By Sandy . . . Halloween 2024 is behind us. This Halloween was same-old, same-old in some respects and something of an anomaly in others.

Once again, no children were snatched by registrants—or by anyone, apparently–as they walked the streets, and none were lured into the homes of registrants with promises of candy and then harmed.

Once again, as far as we could determine, Patch abstained from its “red dot” Halloween maps except for a handful in Illinois whose editor doesn’t seem to have gotten the facts about this. Thank you, Patch.

Once again, politicians decided to get on the “sex offender Halloween” bandwagon, like this Kentucky legislator who wants to create a state law barring registrants from participating in Halloween activities that involve children and the attorney general in Illinois who announced the importance of checking the sex offender registry before trick-or-treating.

Once again, law enforcement could take a lesson from Patch as some are still tying compliance checks of registrants with Halloween safety for trick-or-treaters, as in this example from Marion County, Tennessee, where law enforcement involved “multiple agencies” in “Operation Trick or Treat” and this one from Milwaukee County, Wisconsin where one officer is quoted as doing this “because I love making our community safe.”

The next time your local law enforcement talks about how understaffed they are, you might check to see if they are like the one that sent “more than 20 deputies” out on Halloween to be sure all registrants had their lights off.

That example is from Greene County, Missouri, where, ironically, in nearby Newton County, a traffic altercation occurred that injured a trick-or-treating three-year old—thankfully, not seriously—and killed the young adult accompanying the child.

That traffic accident was an anomaly as the individual who was killed is, as far as research has determined, the only pedestrian Halloween death this year.

Another child was involved in a car-pedestrian accident in Alabama but also escaped serious injuries, and two teenage pedestrians were injured, both non-fatally, in Colorado. No other reports of Halloween evening pedestrian-automobile accidents could be found, making this year the safest for trick-or-treaters in a long time.

Another anomaly is the last-minute avalanche of sensible articles giving factual and helpful warnings.

Some, like this one in Colorado, made it clear the focus would be drivers who chose to drink and drive. Likewise, the Florida Law Enforcement Liaison Program announced, “Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving,” for their 2024 Halloween campaign.

In the 24 – 48 hours before Halloween, media outlets from California to Texas, from Pennsylvania to North Carolina to Florida peppered the internet with pieces about Halloween safety for kids while trick-or-treating. With headers like, “Why cars might be the scariest thing this Halloween,” “Halloween’s biggest risk? Keeping kids safe from traffic,” and “What makes Halloween so scary? Being a pedestrian,” the primary focus was clear.

Whether this year really is an anomaly or whether it is the beginning of a break-through remains to be seen. For now, we can be thankful for the present victories.

The post Halloween, 2024–an anomoly or a new beginning? first appeared on NARSOL.

By Sandy . . . Looking at some of the headers of the articles sent in today’s alerts, I cannot help but shake my head in wonder.

“Communities explore other Halloween plans after sex offender law abolished,” announces a Missouri news outlet. This is in regard to the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent ruling that requiring those on the state sex offender registry to post “No candy here” signs at their homes is unconstitutional.

Even if the signage requirement were not only one part of a comprehensive set of restrictions, would this require that Halloween plans be changed?

Another media outlet says, “California’s tiered sex offender registry law allowed two convicted sex offenders to remain off list.” This is a reference to changes in the registry law in California that allows registrants to be removed after a certain length of time. This is part of a legal process, and a process followed in many states, not, as the article implies, some “loophole” that is used to skirt the law.

In spite of the online outlet Patch abandoning its “red dot” Halloween safety maps in virtually every state and location, a few Illinois editors are running them, “warning” parents where registrants in their communities live. NARSOL has done battle with Patch for years and are pleased that so few editors remain who are willing to defy all empirical evidence by printing this information.

Changing Halloween plans, dismay over legal registry procedures, and trick-or-treat “safety” maps—why would these have me shaking my head in wonder? Perhaps because I am old enough to remember the time when the registry and all it has spawned did not exist.

What was life like then? Were children molested while they were trick-or-treating? Did community members feel panic over who might live down the street? Were sexual crime and reoffenses rampant? Were children grabbed daily—or weekly—or monthly–out of school playgrounds and parks?

No.

Empirical evidence shows the rate of reoffense by those convicted of sexual offenses has remained steady over many years, both before the registry existed and since. As shown in an AI overview, “According to research, there is little evidence to suggest that sexual crime recidivism was significantly worse before the existence of sex offender registries, with most studies indicating that sex offenders generally have a low recidivism rate regardless of the registry system; in fact, some studies even suggest that public registration could potentially increase recidivism rates by making it harder for offenders to reintegrate into society and find employment, potentially leading to further criminal behavior.”

And as far as Halloween, this has been said many times, and it remains true: research reveals no instance of a child being abducted or molested by a person on the registry while trick-or-treating. As far as can be determined, the only time this has happened was pre-registry, in 1973—51 years ago—in Wisconsin. The victim was a little girl named Lisa French, and the perpetrator was someone who, even if there had been registries, would not have been registered.

This is a good place to remember that virtually all sexual crime against children is committed by those who are not already registered. What does this mean for Halloween?

Quoting myself from the Lisa French piece:

According to research, approximately 96% [of the perpetrators of sexual crime] have no previous history of this type of crime and therefore are on no registries. They aren’t locked up or confined to their homes with all lights off on Halloween. They aren’t checked on by law enforcement to assure that they are keeping themselves away from all child-related activities. They don’t show up as red dots on a map warning parents away from those addresses.

They are in your homes, at your parties, in your neighborhoods. They answer the doors and hand out candy to your children. They are where they have always been. And all of the Halloween restrictions on all of the people on sexual offense registries across America mean absolutely nothing.

The post Halloween 50 years ago and now first appeared on NARSOL.