NEWS RELEASE: North Carolina Court Awards NARSOL $18,458 Against Man Who Spread False Claims
Defendant, believed to be a Proud Boys member, never responded to the lawsuit.
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. – A man who spent months posting false allegations about the National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws (NARSOL) on Facebook, including a fabricated claim that the organization is linked to groups advocating child sexual abuse, was ordered last week to pay NARSOL $18,458.56 in damages by North Carolina Superior Court Judge Clayton Somers.
Ronald Creighton Davis, of Pierce County, Georgia, never answered the lawsuit. He didn’t file paperwork and didn’t appear in court; he did not contest anything.
Davis participated in multiple campaigns aimed at preventing NARSOL from holding its annual conference. The first succeeded. In June 2025, a Hilton property in Grand Rapids canceled NARSOL’s conference contract after a pressure campaign that included online threats, doxxing of NARSOL leadership, in-person hotel pamphleting, and calls to Hilton’s corporate offices. Davis bragged in his posts that he helped make that happen, affiliating his actions with the Proud Boys, a Southern Poverty Law Center-designated hate group.
The second campaign targeted a Holiday Inn property in Atlanta that fall. The strategy was the same: flood the hotel with calls, manufacture a scandal, incite outrage by falsely associating NARSOL with child sexual abuse, dox hotel staff, and make it too costly for the venue to honor the contract. This campaign failed, and the conference was held as planned.
“We are an organization advocating for the modernization of obsolete laws that ‘sound tough’ but, in reality, have proven ineffective and often harmful,” said NARSOL Executive Director Brenda Jones. “We don’t advocate for harming children. We never have. And if you visit narsol.org, you can read exactly what we do and what we don’t do, in plain English.”
Davis’s false statements were not accidental. NARSOL counsel Paul Dubbeling, Esq. of P.M. Dubbeling PLLC in Chapel Hill, described it in court filings as a deliberate strategy to invoke public fear and disgust, to make ordinary people and hotel managers react emotionally before they had time to verify anything.
“This small group systematically lied about who we are and what we do. They used lies to drive a hotel out of a legal contract with us,” said Jones. “But then, they didn’t bother to respond to a lawsuit. We sued. We won.”
NARSOL filed the lawsuit on October 7, 2025. Davis was served but failed to respond within the required time. The court’s order was filed on May 18, 2026.
“With this ruling, the court sends a clear message,” added Jones. “You cannot harass a civil rights organization out of existence by loudly repeating lies.”
Case: NARSOL v. Ronald Creighton Davis et al., No. 25CV035559-910, Wake County Superior Court, North Carolina
Media contact: Brenda Jones, [email protected] | www.narsol.org


Strangely, I saw many news articles of many men, who is accused or convicted of child sexual abuse crimes, is actually linked to far-right movements or ideologies. It is crazy that same men who falsely accused marginalized people for same crimes they committed!
My understanding of civil law (admittedly very limited and could be wrong) is that the venue for civil cases is usually the respondent’s county of residence or employment, depending on the claim. It makes me wonder why this case was filed in North Carolina instead of Pierce County, Georgia.
I wouldn’t count on Davis paying. If he didn’t respond to the summons, I can’t imagine he’d give credence to the ruling. Nor can I think of any authority the Wake County court would have over resident out of state regarding its ruling.
Did NARSOL sue Hilton Corporate and enjoined The Franchisor of the property, the land owner of the property, and the building owner? $18K is a piss in a bucket.
Breach of Contract; Triple damages; Mental Anguish; Collateral Damage; Libel; Slander..The Full Monty!!!
Hope so..sue them. settle for nothing less than $250K
NARSOL relies on the advice of its attorney to bring cases that are sustainable. The money was never the main objective.